Jump to content

csdenmark

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    1,422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by csdenmark

  1. Looks like this request makes good sense for teaching sessions. I understand this kind of format: Teacher: hjhh kljhlkjhlk ljuioupou9p 789879 My comment: nvnbvm nbkuyto uoig jkhjkh Teacher: kljlk iouyiop tutuy kljlk Teacher: hjklh jhgjk ytryu tuuti My comment: 67587 gfjhgf uhkl My suggestion is: Rightclick teachers name for copy the text - then paste that into a separate editor and make your comments there. After the teaching session is ended you can copy/paste all from your editor into your chatlog or copy/paste your chatlog into the editor you have used. In Denmark we call that kind 'active listening'
  2. Update your IE to latest version - completely free to do so Delete all of your temporary internet files Be sure your settings are updating every time you access an internet site Reduce the number of days storing your temporary internet sites - I have 3 days This is the way to solve problems with Gmail account and cannot harm you but will do nothing or something good for you. Worth a try I think.
  3. Agree Richard! I normally call it a strong 'trash can' - but just the same. On the other hand - much of the fun playing Precision comes from the features assigned to 1♣ opening. It is here you have most of the asking bids and it is also here it is disclosed whether your new partner is a Precision player or just a strong club player. The strong club opening is the nerve of the system but the advantage is of course the limit openings and the absence of all the curious conventions used in standard systems in order to sort out range and distribution. This advantage is of course shared with most other strong systems(Pass-, club- and diamond systems).
  4. I disagree Jack. It is no weakness of precision but a strong argument for playing solid versions - and that only. I agree with you that handle of interference is of great importance but also defense. Bidding sequences for uncontested actions tend to be obsolete nowadays. I studied Bocchi-Duboin system a month ago. A rather poor construction summarised as: 5 card major Balanced Preempts It is in fact an excellent system due to emphasiz on interference handle and defense. A bit similar you see by Hamway, an ordinary canape' system with solid interference handle.
  5. You seem to misunderstand - there is no need to spend any money to open the WordPro document. The two documents ( i.e. Precision.Doc and Precision.lwp) are the same - just available for different wordprocessing programs <_< And you can open Precision.doc with any version of Microsoft Word. Thank you Denis. I see that Helene was right in her assumption that it was the same document in 2 different formats. What I am interested of is Jannersten version to see the differences between Jannersten and Belladonna/Garozzo. I have ordered for the Jannersten book for that purpose. Thank you very much Denis. - You have been very helpful.
  6. Sorry - I am not going to purchase $ 19,- to be able to open the document. If the document is important I think Oliver will be able to convert into standard formats.
  7. This is the private but very solid version: Precision.doc(MS-Word-473k) The other version below I cannot open and WEB-search cannot find an application. Denis do you know which application can be used to read the document below? Precision.lwp, (WordPro-550k)
  8. Thank you Denis. The version Oliver has put up is a complete SUPER-Precision version. As far as I am informed Oliver is using Jannersten which might be the reason for the 1♣ - 2NT feature Helene is mentioning. I have taken a quick glance at the version and I see it is in many ways similar to Belladonna/Garozzo version. I will check whether the differences in names of features are substantial too or only names. Until now I have rejected new partnerships based on Jannersten but from now on I intend to accept. Especially I noticed Oliver is emphasizing the principle of captaincy. As it is one of the basic principles for Precision I think many posters in this Forum will spend their time well reading that.
  9. Sorry Micky - you are quite right. I need to realize where the first point is to be blind. I delete my post now as it is obsolete.
  10. In Belladonna/Garozzo it means CAB(Control asking Bid). In this case 1st step will be 3 controls. All jumps to 4♣ are CAB unless if clubs has been bidden naturally. Then CAB is substituted by 4♦. If good values have been shown response scale starts by 3 else by 1.
  11. Interesting idea Helene but the real problem you see in most topics in this area - everybody want their personal version of Precision. You mention Asia and Bulgaria and you are quite right it is also among those + americans I find my partners. In both China and India the problem really is they have national standards for Precision. So too in Bulgaria. I dont remember the asian specialities but bulgarians plays 15-17 range NT. I have the impression that in India the standard is very near to Power Precision(Sontag/Weichsel). In USA the standard is Goren/Wei. Lately I have noticed that many players, even from Turkey, knows Meckwell Club. Maybe instead try to make a modern championsystem a standard which at least not yet has been infected with a lot of personal interpretations.
  12. That kind of features looks a bit more restricted than I thought when I informed of such in another thread for chat for everyone. I think it is because of the discussion about sex-abuses. But I think the most simple way is chat rooms in communities. Yahoo has similar communities and facilities. It looks to me that only 1 chat room is available for each community - but then just open more new communities. I think they have as well WEB-cam facilities + speaking but right now I cannot find them. I have enabled the chat room in my community bridgeFILES for you to test. http://groups.msn.com/bridgeFILES/chatroom.msnw I assume you will need to sign up before you can use it here: http://groups.msn.com/bridgeFILES/join Then just chat away! --------------- Another simple way of course including all facilities is to all to connect to a Messenger. But that is best for a group knowing each other. ------------------- I found 2 chat room free software - here the info: http://www.das-download-archiv.de/download.php?id=360 http://www.das-download-archiv.de/download.php?id=1211 I dont know them ------------------ These below looks just perfect. Simple and free - ready to use with no registrations. http://www.thefreesite.com/Free_Chat_Services/ http://www.freejavachat.com/
×
×
  • Create New...