Jump to content

pooltuna

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    3,814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by pooltuna

  1. If you want insurance go apply to Lloyd's of London ;)
  2. It will probably be easier to make 1♦ than 2NT :D
  3. It shows a weak hand and is not forcing? ♦Yes, I agree, but do you really think 1♠ will be passed out? If so, you probably don't need to be any higher. Is this hand really worth an immediate GF ? A jump in your longest suit, would show this strength, but I see it may cause problems for partner as well as Opener. What do I do after: 1♥-x-p-3♦jump 4♣-4♦-p-? - - - - - - - - - - - - - Maybe a different rule "violation" is warranted: 1♥-x-p-2♠jump I would bid 4♠ before I would bid 2♠
  4. 1) 2♠ willing to pass 3♣ is enough for me 2) yes 3♣ but I am passing over 4♥ 3) I considered 1NT in 3rd seat IMPS V holding ♠AKQTx ♥xx ♦QTx ♣Kxx 4) Duck smoothly. If declarer now produces the AKQ♣ and another ♠ they missed 6 so I won't get a 0.
  5. It also means that it is a slam you don't want to be in. Maybe so. But it is not as bad as you might think. The ♦ finesse is more than 50% to work and if the Jack♣ falls in 4-2 breaks you are a cow in clover.
  6. It shows a weak hand and is not forcing? exactly something like[hv=s=sxxxhxxxxdxxxcxxx]133|100|[/hv]
  7. I answer the question with the apparent appropriate answer 6♥
  8. That is true but you have to consider as well 19+6 +9=34 so the K♣ and the A♥ will be hard for partner to hold notwithstanding upgrade arguments you can give him ♥K ♣K as well. If you believe that why didn't you put up the ♥Q at trick 1?
  9. well it may be a concern but I only have 1 HCP! How many do you think the 2♦ preemptor has? Having added our and RHO's HCP do you really think partner only has 12 with a quiet LHO after we pass? Even worse after our 4♥ bid and 5♦ from LHO do you think partner is going to just bid 5♥ with say [hv=s=sakxxhaqdxckqxxxx]133|100|[/hv]
  10. StepBridge has the best (most usable?) rating system I have seen. Basically when you join you are assigned a rating of 1-1(MP-IMP) with rating corrections after every 20 hands (increase or decrease 1) and no bunny bashing here if you had a 5-4 rating playing with a like partner against 2 newbies you would be spotting 1.5 IMPS/hand (difference between IMP ratings * 0.25) and you need to average more than 0.5 IMPs/hand to increase.
  11. 1NT wtp? i guess then, when you double after the insufficient bid, partner is truly barred. exactly :lol:
  12. That is true but you have to consider as well 19+6 +9=34 so the K♣ and the A♥ will be hard for partner to hold notwithstanding upgrade arguments
  13. Better to congratulate yourself for your braveness when partner instead turns up with ♠KQJx, ♥-,♦Axxx,♣AJxxx I prefer to fight it out at 5♠, if necessary. Rainer Herrmann Partner has minimums way more than he has maximums! The question is what a minimum double should look like at unfavorable vulnerability at the 4 level. To me your hand looks like a normal minimum takeout double at the one level. And if you consider your hand a minimum double at the 4 level, mine is certainly not a maximum and the range becomes extremely wide. Catering for the absolute minimum in such a scenario will lead to far more missed slams than taking the middle ground with a slightly more optimistic view will lead to minus scores. Rainer Herrmann Rainer That is not a nut you are trying to crack it is a diamond! GL :lol:
  14. Your problem is not the opponents but your partner even a 4♥ bid at this point could put you into an unmakeable slam. My best guess is that you need to take the last call which means you have to pass at this stage ready to make your upcoming 4 or 5♥ call next round.
  15. Well I am bidding either 4♥ or 4♣. 4♣ to maybe start the defense correctly against 4 or 5♠
  16. Well I use 1NT=15-17 1m-1x-2NT=18-19 2NT=20-21 2c-2x-2NT=22-23 2c-2x-3NT=24-25 and 25+6=31<33 so my call is Pass KISS
  17. wtp ...DOUBLE!!!.....Oh wait that is my blithering idiot partner who didn't want to give me chance to whack 3♥.....so 6♦....that should hurry the process of getting a new partner :(
  18. WAIT! Does this mean that bridge is not a euphemism for ego? :(
  19. ATB? Only if lady Luck available to accept!! Wouldn't you essentially bid the same with[hv=s=skxxhaqxdxcxxxxxx]133|100|[/hv]
  20. If they haven't got a ♠ stopper why wouldn't I lead the A. At least I get to look at dummy most of the time
  21. If you have to ask....BTW where do you pigeons fly for the winter?
  22. keycard Playing with pickup partners I never use J2NT because there are too many variations of followups
  23. you have enough controls & Ts to warrant a try
×
×
  • Create New...