Adam, I would think of Shane for junior with recent successes. TBH I am more concerned about how the 2 teams will be picked once the 6 pairs are selected. Top 3 and bottom 3 is a horrible format. Top 2 picking the third is more reasonable, but still not great. I think if once the 6 pairs are selected a committee reviews the results of the trials and picks the top 2 pairs to pick their third pair is the most fair and accurate way to get the best two teams. Note that this is better than that committee picking the top 3, as we SHOULD know by now the top 3 pairs do not necessarily make the top team.