TWO4BRIDGE
Advanced Members-
Posts
2,246 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by TWO4BRIDGE
-
If you kept the Michaels bid "lower" , then there would be no ambiguity about Exclusion: ( 1D ) - 2D - ( p ) - 3S jump ( p ) - 5C!
-
What if North pulls to 7 of his long running minor ? You won't be on lead and they may have "14" tricks without a ♠ lead .
-
Another 2/1 auction could be: 1S - 2C 2H - 2NT 4NT - 6NT
-
Slam wouldn't look so hot if North's minor suits were reversed ....
-
Maybe my keycard-ask is all wet, but I would think Responder needs another outside K to accept the 5S-ask . ( Shortness in partners opening suit seems a put-off too ) .
-
I was never thinking of the grand on this auction. If North shows the missing key card, I'll just bid 6S . If North doesn't have it, I'm signing off in 5S .
-
Seems like almost everyone stays away from 4NT as RKCB. I think 4NT-RKCB is what South should bid instead of 5S.
-
Just some side notes... When ♥ are trump, Meckwell plays 4S = regular kickback-RKCB and 4NT! as voidwood-RKCB ( ♠Ace excluded ) . I think it goes something like this: 1NT - 4D! 4H - ??? ....... 4S! = regular kickback-RKCB ....... 4NT! = Voidwood, excluding ♠ ....... 5C! = Voidwood, excluding ♣ ....... 5D! = Voidwood, excluding ♦. Meckwell, then uses the following "Responder-showing" slamish bids after a simple transfer to ♥ ( implying long ♥) : 1NT - 2D! 2H - ??? ...... 4S! = "showing" 0 or 3 ......4NT! = 1 or 4 ...... 5C! = 2 - ♥Q ...... 5D! = 2 + ♥Q
-
Suppose Responder wanted to sign-off in 5NT, could that be achieved by bidding 5S over the 5H reply ? ( I think that is the way it was done eons ago ). Or 5S could be a K-ask .
-
Just bid small slam yourself. Opener has to have the rest of the Kings for his opener ( especially with no ♥Q ) opposite your 17 hcp.
-
I expect it to go like this: 1C - 1S 2H - 2S 3D - 3NT .... unless Responder has 4 cards ♥.
-
fit-bid or splinter?
TWO4BRIDGE replied to kgr's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
I have in my files ( sorry, no link ) from 2004 regarding Rubens Transfer Advances . He defines the following "Jumps" by Advancer : a ) A jump-shift is a fit-bid in support of overcaller's suit ...... ( 1C ) - 1H - ( p ) - 2S/3D = fit-showing-jumps b ) A jump-cue-bid to the 3-level ( ie. a single-jump ) shows the values for a constructive raise ( 7-9 hcp) with four or more trumps. ...... ( 1C ) - 1H - ( p ) - 3C! c ) A jump-cue-bid to the 4-level ( ie. a double-jump ) shows shortness, support and a slam try ... 4+ trumps ...... ( 1C ) - 1H - ( p ) - 4C! = splinter . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - kgr : Now, regarding your auction, if the overcall were 2C, then 3D would be a fit-showing jump and 4D would be a splinter. But, since your overcall is 3C [ 6c♣; intermediate (10-15 HCP) ] , you may have to redefine to whatever you agree with partner . -
settle for small slam, or try for more?
TWO4BRIDGE replied to CSGibson's topic in Interesting Bridge Hands
I'd sure like to know why Opener jumped to 5D in the GF auction when 4D would suffice and deny a Club Ctrl as well. -
Here is a "result" of all "resulting" : ( p )- 1C - ( 3S ) - ?? Nouth, with no 2-quick losers bids 4NT = RKCB for their last bid suit as trump: ♣ . South replies 5D ( 1 or 4 ) North assumes it is 4 key cards which includes the ♣K and can count 13 tricks off the top and bids 7NT .
-
Best post ever.
-
2S = either of 2 types of hands [ EDIT: Not standard, but one of many treatments ] : 1) 8-9 hcp w/4s but not 4h or 2)4s/6m, weak Continuations after: 1NT - 2C, 2H - 2S, .... Opener - Responder 2NT - p ( hand # 1 ) 2NT - 3C/3D ( hand # 2 ) 3C - p ( hand # 2 w/6c) 3C - 3D ( hand # 2 w/6d ) 3S ( max, 4s for Opener ) 3S - p ( hand # 2 ) 3S - 4S ( hand # 1 )
-
Advancing a 1S overcall, episode 351
TWO4BRIDGE replied to mgoetze's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
Quacks aplenty ... I'll try 1NT too . -
I think I'll just go 4H with this 5 LTC hand .
-
Amusing Freak from last night
TWO4BRIDGE replied to hrothgar's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
I've seen the Offensive-to-Defensive Ratio mentioned a number of times lately . How does one calculate it ? -
I just read a Bobby Wolff newspaper column where he said " ... with 5 4 2 2 hands and a 5 card major, never open 1NT ... "
-
Finding your minor suit slams!
TWO4BRIDGE replied to 32519's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
Ditto. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDIT: Over 1NT open, you need sequences for: A) Long ♣: weak, invitational, slammish B) Long ♦: weak, invitational, slammish C) 2-suiter minors ( 5/4 )+ : weak, invitational, slammish I think Minor Suit Stayman ( rather than 4-way transfers ) is better because of the 2-suiters ( C )... but you are right.. every system has drawbacks But then to show weak, long ♣, you use the sequence: 1NT - 2NT! ( relay to 3C ); and then your 2NT invite hand will go thru Stayman . I'll let you ( or someone else ) to look up the rest . -
1NT - 2C 2D - 2H = classic Garbage Stayman ( see posts 2 and 5 ) < 7 hcp (4/4)+ Majors, equal length or longer ♠---never longer ♥.
-
What is the "mixed raise" bid for this hand ? ( I assume 2S! is the limit raise w/ 3 or 4 cards, and 3H the weak raise w/4 cards, and 2H = simple raise w/ 3 cards and ~ 6 - 9 hcp ) .
-
Hope you weren't including my post # 2 which was a precursor to my brilliant conclusion ( if I must say so myself ) in post # 12 .
-
Duck . If East then returns another ♠, you lead the ♣ to your A 10 , playing East for the K . If East returns a ♦, you will still win on the board for the ♣ lead, unless West puts up the Ace. In that case you will get a losing ♠ pitch on the long ♦. Once the ♠ loser is taken care of, only then can you start trumps ( ♥ ). EDIT: I corrected the misprinted "loser" to ♠ .
