Oof Arted

;) Question setting up a CC How do I set it up to have opponents bidding/overcalling so as to enter our bidding after there interference/doubles :(

;) agree with ed :)

:( Robin I am not saying this case is or is not a psyche My main point is that in a lot of tournies the organisers have decided you cannot use psyches or HUMS That is up to them If you disagree with the ban Then you don't play As you should have read after I said I am not saying the TD was correct Merely pointing to the I may wana psyche lobby that they play elsewhere ;)

;) If the organisers of the Free Tourney decide that Psyches and HUMS are Banned in their Tourneys Then they are Banned Read the Tourney rules BEFORE entering If you then enter said Tourney then it is YOUR fault not the TD's I am not saying this ruling is right or wrong All I will say is dont enter said Tourney again ^_^

:lol: is it as simple as that they are all Welsh ??? :lol:

;) You could of course play all 6 board matches all Swiss Teams thus you would need 1 set of boards for every 3 tables and just circulate the boards around the loop or loops of tables :lol:

:D rofl but i ain't a politician :P

;) did the obverse some time ago when it became apparent that the Playing TD at the club was listeng to us commenting on slams being made and not being made (we played precision at the time and were bidding or not bidding them , he would bid or not bid them where others would not or would So we deliberately told lies and sure enough he was not in or in when he shou;d have been He twigged after a few disasters and gave up :rolleyes:

Does not compute. ;) Never mind trusting Journalists What about Politicians ??? :rolleyes:

:D http://www.malhanga.com/videosflash/ :D

;) Works for me :)

;) David surely you cannot mean how this reads you know that we use duplimated boards thus it is possible to have a board that does not corespond to all the rest of the boards bearing the same number So how does that equate to 'Organisers ' being 'incompetent' In the case of this 'Rogue' board some recompense is necessary for the tables/teams affected <_<

:o you could send posts direct to UDAY :)

;) I must be down to his 'intent' he was intending to finesse against the known Queen and that is what he did, that he was not paying attention is TOUGH ;)

Goody, does that mean I can fine Bluejak when he next does this (please)? :D I would go further and stick david with the heftiest PP I could think of :D :)

;) duno I could get it to 49.2% if you were in other seats :D

???? 11 tricks? ;) 11 only in the wirral methinks But claim is perfectly correct :)

:( IMHO the TD was wrong He should have been called and he should hold up play until HE (TD) has gone through the play thus far :D

;) with jeremy loses 1 trick ;)

:wacko: opps sorry didn't scroll down obviously some one who was playing Snap must be an 'Expert' ;)

:huh: must be missing something there is no 6♥XX shown ? B)

;) perhaps just being awake would help :rolleyes:

:D I would have no hesitation in ruling it RED and doing 60/30 :rolleyes:

:blink: darn it i am leaving tunisia to come back to blighty on the 16th :(

:D agree with mrdct it is the most likely cause even though perhaps the 'booting' should be done immediately by the host/td :rolleyes: