mohitz

Partner knows how to play bridge too. If it is right for us to bid NT, we will surely get a chance later. As pointed out, bidding 2N makes it difficult to reach diamond slam and also is an underbid.

I don't understand why you want pass as NF. If there was no interference, 2♠ committed to at least 3♥. I don't see why things should change now. Given that pass is forcing, pass showing extras is better because i) When we are weak, opponents are more likely to buy the contract. Bidding 3♥ immediately gives them less room to work out their best strain/level. ii) When we have extras, we are more likely to buy the contract. Passing gives us space to work out our best level and perhaps strain too.

[hv=pc=n&s=s8hat982dat5caj72]133|100[/hv] 1♥ - 2NT 3♠ - 4♥ ? GIB bids 5 clubs alerted as cuebid, 18-19 points.

What game? Pass.

Not sure if i will reach slam but I don't like West's bid of 5♦. I think West should make a forcing pass and pass if partner doubles. Here of course, East will bid 4♠ showing 6-5 after which I have no clue what I will bid as West heh

[hv=pc=n&n=sakt2hdakq432cq63]133|100[/hv] IMPs, vulnerable against not (pass) - 1♦ - (pass) - 1NT (2♥) - ? Standard setting, not much agreements, X here would be penalty. If you bid 2♠, does that establish forcing pass at any level?

(1♦) - 2♦ - (pass) - 2♥ (pass) - ? I guess most play 2N as some sort of ask. What is your response structure? The motivation for this is the following hand that I played today :) [hv=pc=n&n=sakt432hakq432dca]133|100[/hv] EDIT: Bonus question: Do you always bid 2♥ with equal length or do you bid your better suit? Do you have different relay responses to 2N after a 2♠ response?

Agree with 1♦. Now pass

congratulations :(

Is there any place I can get the results of the Rosenblum? The WBF website isn't being updated it seems.

Allegra by 1 IMP on the last deal of the match where they gained 10 imps.

X = values 4N = minors, but 4N = RKC is playable too.

IMPs, partner deals ♠x ♥AKQ9xx ♦AKT ♣Jxx p - (p) - 1♥ - (2♠) 3♥ - (4♠) - ? If vulnerability matters, say so.

I think i will bid but pass is clearly a logical alternative imo

3♣;3♦

What range do you play this?

♠xx ♥xx ♦AKxxx ♣AKxx RHO deals and opens 2♠ playing IMPs. If vulnerability matters, say so.

So, partner opens 1♠, RHO bids 3♣ weak. What is a typical 4♠ hand? If vulnerability matters, say so. What do you bid on the following hands? 1) ♠xxxxx ♥xxxx ♦xxxx ♣- 2) ♠xxxxx ♥Axxx ♦xxxx ♣- 3) ♠xxxxx ♥Axxx ♦Axxx ♣- What about these hands? 4) ♠xxxx ♥Qxxx ♦xxxx ♣x 5) ♠xxxx ♥Axxx ♦xxxx ♣x And also 6) ♠KQTx ♥Jxxx ♦Kx ♣xxx 7) ♠KQTx ♥Kxxx ♦Kx ♣xxx Thanks

This happens when they are invisible i think and not randomly.

p - (p) - 1♣ - (1N) X GIB doubles with ♠x ♥Q8xx ♦AJxx ♣9xxx. Surely, this is insane.

Non forcing but shows extras. Typically short clubs, 5+ diamonds and some hearts.

Perhaps 5-2 majors COG?

3♦. If partner bids 3♥, will bid slam. Else, i am content with 3N.

teams, vul against not, third seat. ♠KQJxx ♥Txx ♦Txx ♣xx

None vulnerable, teams (4♠) - p - (p) - p Result: 4♠-1. 5♣ is on for NS. [hv=d=w&v=n&n=sxhxxdaxxxxcajxxx&w=saqj8xxxxhxxdtckt&e=st9xhqj9xdkqjxxcx&s=skhaktxxdxxcq97xx]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]