georgi

Thanks, fixed in v34. Now 2NT would show 3-6 in opened minor and 2-4 in rest suits.

To bid 2♠ over 2♣ GIB needed 9+TP, having 8TP it passed. Thus, 3♠ should be 8-TP ( 6-8 ). Will be corrected for next version ( passing twice i guess ).

Thanks for reporting. In next version,v34, GIB will strive to step slowly and using cuebids as much as possible here. Then 4NT will prevail the leap to 6/7.

Thanks for reporting it. It's fixed in current version in production, v33. It used to be a bug with 2NT call here. Now GIB will just bid 3S as North. -> 3+ ♠; 7-14 total points Also 2X overcall is fixed and it shows 9+TP, not 9

Actually here 2♦ was supposedly GF. It shows in v34 fit in partner's suit and 13+TP. Also fixed the brave 2♥, which is also cuebiding their suit, even if 2♦ was weaker, requirement for 2♥ was 14+ non vulnerable, 16+ vulnerable, so steam is released and such overbidding will be avoided.

Thanks for reporting. It's partly fixed in v33. Polished a bit more in v34.

GIB in v33 should already do it. So should be ok now.

In v34 both things should be improved. 1) The sudden disappearance of 2-3 cards from 1NT , showing 1 spade. 2) Double will be avoided with lack of 3TP.

It should be fine in v33 ( current now since April 10th ). It promises biddable diamonds, and it's penalty. 5+HCP, 8-TP.

Will be addressed as currently Redouble === Stayman. Probably with good opposition as defensive cards, like 4+ 4+ GIB would postpone a little 3NT over calls like X ( from passed hand ) or 2♦ ( any ) , both promising majors.

Yes, thanks. Fixed in v34.

Will be addressed what is the correct call in v34, but for sure it will be removed as option to double with such hand.

Thanks for reporting. Fixed in v34. GIB having enough strength and matching requirements for 4H could do it without passing through fake cue first with lack of further resources.

Thanks for reporting. It's fixed in v34. GIB would not extend second suit with insufficient length. And would be able to pass, even with singleton with minimal hand.

GIB would rebid 2♥. Having 19TP and 5+ own suit it perfectly matches the X+2♥ ( 5+ suit and 18+TP ).

Thanks for reporting it. It's fixed in version which was applied recently, v33.

Thanks for reporting it. The bug was made in v29. It will be fixed in next version. v34.

Thanks for reporting it. That problem is fixed in coming v33. It should be on place in the next several days.

Thanks for reporting it. Problem actually applies for all followons after opening 2weak. 2weak - Double - 3 in another suit. Note taken to be implemented some meaning in next v34.

Thanks for reporting it. Explanation is as planned, just GIB used last train rule just to double with some values. 1NT - 4m - 4M is 6+ cards. 1NT - 3M/4m - 4minor is not defined. Note taken all these to be polished.

Well, that's not really a bug. As per GIB currently 4NT is not defined over 1M. While there is 2NT in disposal, 4NT has no meaning. I assume we should add some meaning even if bid is not used by GIB, at least will be comprehended.

Well, it's kind of close requirement to Uncontested 1M - 2M 4M Despite 1M where it promises opening hand responder's values are almost the same ( 7-10 vs 7-9 in the diagram ). Anyway, note taken for polishing the explanation of some lower range. like 15-18TP or similar.

Thanks for reporting it. Fix will be applied in v34.

Thanks for reporting it. Looks like bug for both 3NT with both majors where Double is not defined. Also Not doubling from each side is due bug. Fix will be applied in v34.

Thanks for reporting it. 4M over 3M requires 13+TP. GIB having 12 needed to simulate. and it picks in 80-85% in the cases. Unfortunately here it didn't. However will be investigated for better evaluation of the shape to raise a bit more if partner didn't upgrade much.