lowerline
Full Members-
Posts
553 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by lowerline
-
(3m) 4♣ (other minor + unknown major) then 4♦ asks major; 4nt slamtry minor (3m) 4♦ (both majors) then 4nt slamtry ♥; cuebid slamtry ♠ (3M) 4♣ (clubs + other major) then cuebid slamtry ♣; 4nt slamtry major (3M) 4♦ (diamonds + other major) then cuebid slamtry ♦; 4nt slamtry major So the slamtry bids are always the cuebid and 4nt, the lowest of these for the lowest of our suits... Steven
-
The strong 2nt opening is often called a slam-killer. If you make this opening 22-23 iso 20-21 it will come up less often, hence less slams will be killed... Usually the 2nt opening only has a 2-point range because a 3-point range is too hard to handle. That 3-point range is less of a problem after a 2♣ opening. That might fit in better with your system. Steven
-
I think you can only get to six if South opens 2nt... However I don't agree with defending 4♠. 5♣ seems clear to me. Steven
-
Agree. I prefer 1♠. Second choice 4♠ in 1st/3rd or 3♠ in 2nd. Steven
-
Replacement for gambling 3NT?
lowerline replied to Quartic's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
Or: 4♣ = asks transfer into major 4♦ = asks major If you bid on over partners answer, your initial 4m must be re-interpreted as a cue and slam-interest... Steven -
All these sequences show a 6crd heart suit: 1. 1nt-2♦-2♥-4♥ 2. 1nt-2♦-2♥-jump to show splinter 3. 1nt-4♦-4♥-pass 4. 1nt-4♦-4♥-4nt (RKB) 1 = slam-interest without shortness 2 = slam-interest with shortness 3 = no slam-interest 4 = plan to bid slam with enough keycards Steven
-
Inferences playing Walsh
lowerline replied to Bende's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
1. invitational or slamtry (opener bids 3♥ with a minimum) 2. GF (but not enough for a slamtry) Steven -
Win the ace. Cash two spades. If spades are 3-2 you have no problem. If spades are 4-1, play a diamond to the Q next. Only if the diamond king is in West together with the remaining trumps, you have a problem. Then the only remaining chance is a red suit squeeze. Steven
-
Does this auction exist?
lowerline replied to Antrax's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
a) inv; 2♥ is a weak hand with 6 spades and 3 hearts b) inv; 2♥ is preference -
responding to negative doubles
lowerline replied to rsteele's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
Both are minimal in high card points, but 2♠ shows an unbalanced hand, while 1♠ shows a balanced hand. This is especially interesting for those who play a short club... Steven -
Choice should be between double and 3♠... This hand is too strong for 2♠. I prefer 3♠. Steven
-
Exactly. So you must play North for 5-3-3-2. Play the ♣Q (which North must duck) and duck a club to his ace next. Opps make 4 spade tricks and 1 club for just made. Steven
-
Playing a 15-17 1NT, which gadgets are recommended?
lowerline replied to 32519's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
3, 5, 6 & 12 But only 3 responses to Puppet Stayman: 3M 5crd suit & 3♦ no 5crd M Steven -
Why can't South have 16-17 hcp and a 6crd heart suit? Why shouldn't North pass that at matchpoints? I don't believe that 3♥ can be that strong that 6♣ is laydown. 3♠ is the only way to 3nt. North has to decide right now what the most likely game is. Maybe 4♣ is better, but if 3nt makes, 3♠ can hardly be a joke... South knows there is a diamond fit. If he doubles again now, he can always bid 5♦ later. Are you so worried that 4♥ makes and 5♦ doesn't? Steven
-
I can understand Norths pass. 3♥ is limited after all... North should have bid 3♠ anyway because it's imps. I think another double by South is better than 3♥. With one more heart and and a few points less 3♥ would have been spot on... North 60% South 40%
-
Ghestem: Is it a good convention?
lowerline replied to 32519's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
Read this -
Double to invite 4♠4♥. I don't agree with 2♣. I would have bid 1♠.2nt. If partner then bids 3♠, I will bid 4♠.
-
Simple line: heart finesse There might be a heart/spade or a heart/diamond squeeze against East, but you won't be able to tell... Only the triple squeeze is automatic. That's just a matter of playing out the clubs.
-
Kickback - ROPI
lowerline replied to jillybean's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
I'd say that (expert) standard is pass without heart control, redouble with first-round control and another cuebid with control in both suits. Edit: I see now I misunderstood... ROPI makes sense. -
Discarding problem as declarer
lowerline replied to Antrax's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
1 spade & 2 hearts from both hands Cash one spade and cash all the clubs, pitching another spade from dummy, play heart to the king. Steven -
Looks like West started with J3-7x-Q765-KT864. Then East started with T976-JT8x-T8-J32. One down. But just maybe West had JT3-7-Q765-KT864 (this would correspond with East's H8). So SQ next. Edit: I just saw your answer. I played the right card ;-)
-
correct lead?
lowerline replied to mikl_plkcc's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
+1 And the double on 5♥... I would sympathize if South had overcalled 2♥. Steven -
Non-Leaping Michaels
lowerline replied to 32519's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
Or 4♦ mild slamtry in either suit --4♥ no interest in ♥ ----4♠/nt mild slamtry in ♣ ----5♣ sign off --4♠ interest in ♥ ----4nt RKB for ♥ ----5♣ mild slamtry in ♣ 4♠ good slamtry in ♣ 4nt good slamtry in ♥ Then East makes a mild slamtry with 4♦ and passes Norths 4♥ Steven -
So North had ♦K942 and made the mistake of not playing the 9 to the first trick... The lead of the Q (or the T) would have been easier for North. I cannot see a winning line in 3nt without a defensive mistake. Though you can keep it to one down by playing on spades instead of hearts. Steven
-
Coffee break time
lowerline replied to ahydra's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
Right ;-) Well, then I play spades from top. If the queen does not drop, 5 club tricks are needed. Steven
