Lovera

The vul situation is : love all. Partner (dealer) open 1♠ (opp pass) and you have:♣A♦AK98♥AQ10984♠54. What is your responsive bidding ?

It is to consider that: E/W have a double fit (than +1 to add). But if bidding is almost right by S with X although partner is a robot that can read differently and that is the why is riskious to think that it has to make a correct bidding to analyze.

Both all want to go on (the extreme are rare).

A way can be : S after partner asks with 4NT can rightly think that N had to have almost 20/+ points to get high and surely 6/+ hearts (and in S hand there is a king). Than answers 5♦(=0-3), Queen ?- yes(=ten fit) with King 6♣ ..(Lovera)

Although Kantar wrote "The Final Word" on 2008. What are the differences with 2004 edition or where i can see about the last work ?

That bar, very thin, was on top of page from right to left side (Google translate). Probably anything actived it.

Pay attention that i don't know much about informatic but if for app it is as scarletv told, because is not avalaible also for the Forum ?

What is "an add-on" ? I was talking that i saw in app a toolbar by Google translate already available at the top of page (at the time of "1832 Oren's DD Challenge 21").

And about application instead ?

When, in 2013 autumn, i begun, initially via application (B♠B), to frequent this site remember there was a Google translate toolbar at the top of app page with this pourpose available for guest (i wrote in italian language). Than re-start it not should have to be difficultous (almost for app and Forum) and can help condivision.

I don't want to say that kickback solution not has to be considered but that, in this way, we can elude the starting by OP interesting problem involving RKB answeres. Than i suggest to remain there. Here we have that : W has splintered(3♦) but subsequently has answered 5♠(=2 with Q) and not 5NT, than void is it not. This answer doesn't give us King indication and/or extra too. I think that is more useful bidding 5NT (here we know that in club and diamond(=singleton) there is any king).

Thanks (to jonottawa) and at this point many wishes for Xmas and happy new year.

My kind of music, as you can see watching my YouTube channel, is type "rock armonic" (Status Quo, ABBA, Elton John, ELO, Stones,..) and not heavy metal or jazz (that can be more interesting also but taste is personal).

Hello, have you seen also this amazing perform of "I only want to be with you"?:

Although you could find ♦ K or ♣ K..(Lovera)

For double jumping bid you must have not more of 8 points in high cards and 5/+ trumps with an unbalanced hand. Here for bidding it you have to consider a plastic valutation so +/-1 card or point then you can apply keycard-Oklahoma for 4♣(=1 keycard) that shows the Ace (partner corrects in 4♥ if not interested).(Lovera)

What's happen with 6♥ ?

It is more interesting transfert in heart suit with superaccept if GIB does : 2♦ - 2♠, 4NT- ..(idem) but now N sees 12 tricks !

Let you see it: http://www.bridgebas...post__p__819065 (Lovera)

Although it is strange that is not visualized "0 views" because i know that (almost) two people have seen my topic and also it being interesting and usefull.

The Rolling Stones are getting back to Blues releasing a new album on December 2 and for instance a track from this one::

It would be appropriate to retain, using GIBs in "Play Anonymously", the memory option let's say for a short time (a week or not more than a month) to allow you to review your hands played for the purpose of study and also to compare both the game and declarative stage in comparison with the other tables. This could also be usefull for Novice or Beginners and should be easier to organize being free and already available.

http://www.bridgeguys.com/squeeze/compound_squeeze.html It is always better, when is possible and you visualized, polite ending chashing winners. These ones have two situations (in this case): double (=comunicant) menace in diamond and unilateral in club or double m. in club and unilateral in diamond plus Jack of heart for a balanced double squeeze with 3 cards.

I think that 6♠ cannot be so sure if diamonds split.

This is like B. Romanet makes explaining double squeeze initially : squeeze card ♣ 7, LHO menace ♥ 9, RHO menace ♦ 8, double m. ♠ 3 with A as winner and 2 for communicant card using always the same cards to present endings (unilaterals controlls with red Jacks - orientation referred to squeeze card).