Lovera

The re-definitions are about : club bid and relatif meaning ( and also for diamond suit ) plus any ultherior integration. So, after 2♣ the first opp bids : X having the suit of Club (and not an unspecified minor) and Heart, 2♦ meaning Diamond and Spade, 2♥ with Heart and Spade, 2♠ (ambigous) with Spade and Club or Heart and Diamond, 2NT with Club and Diamond.

It is remaining the second level bidding reserved for 5-4, 5-5, 6-4 (or more) shape (with almost points in the two suits). At this aim i have choose the Astro convention (with any necessary definition). You can see here how it works: http://www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/astro_defense_method.html

As i already told this one requires an (or, also, differently - as in your case) agreement with partner. I am going to explain my choising about the second level bidding.

Thanks (i don't know it - select ..), i'll try to transcrive.

Other two hands, before continuing. The first by French players Guiton-Covo (in S-N): West ♠ Q105 ♥ 86 ♦ 9753 ♦ KQJ3 in North Covo ♠ 87632 ♥ J7542 ♦ 82 ♣ A East ♠ - ♥ K109 ♦ 1064 ♣ 10976542 in South Guiton ♠ AKJ94 ♥ AQ3 ♦ AKQJ ♣ 8. The bidding (S-N, opp silent): 2♣-3♣(=Ace), 3♠-5♠(=good support), 6♥(=query complement of honors and not longness)-6♠(=negative). Here E-W have a good defence in club suit and if bidding goes ..2♦ by N, 3♣ by E, 3♠ for S, 5♣ (and more) by W,.. The second hand with in W Desrousseaux, in E Poubeau, in N/S Calix and Carcy. The bidding: W 2♣, N p, E 2♦, S 2♥ W 2♠ N 3♥ E 4♠ S 5♣ W p N 6♣ E double (opening lead ♦ A for 6♣X+1). If bidding goes 2♣ by W, 2NT (Unusual No Trump) by N the resulting it'd be the same (In closed room Stoppa in S and Roudinesco in N) The bidding:S p W 2♣ N p E 2♦ S 4♥ W 4♠ N 5♥ E 5♠ S 6♥ W double all pass (the same Ace of diamond for 6♥). (From "Bridge Suspense avec Pierre Jais" by Pierre Jais).W:♠ AQJ1073 ♥ 8 ♦ AKQJ ♣ K6 N:♠ 84 ♥ Q5 ♦ 108742 ♣ AQ92 E:♠ K962 ♥ J73 ♦ 9653 ♣ 83 S:♠5 ♥ AK109642 ♦ - ♣ J10754

Yes, but i don 't know how to do (i am not " expert" about informatic use- sorry)

Three hands for overcall at third level :1) West ♠ J6 ♥ AQ98765 ♦ Q10 ♣ AJ North ♠ Q10984 ♥ J1042 ♦ 86 ♣ 93 East ♠ 732 ♥ 3 ♦ J753 ♣ 106542 South ♠ AK5 ♥ K ♦ AK942 ♣ KQ87 (this hand was played by me w/o interf. for 4♠+1); 2) West ♠ 43 ♥ 976 ♦ KJ98742 ♣ 2 North ♠ J7652 ♥ QJ103 ♦ Q3 ♣ 54 East ♠ 98 ♥ K85 ♦ 106 ♣ QJ10987 South ♠ AKQ10 ♥ A42 ♦ A5 ♣ AK63 Bidding (at table): S 2♣ W 3♦ N p E p, 4♦ p 4♠ p, 6♠; 3) West ♠ QJ109876 ♥ - ♦ QJ9 ♣ QJ8 North ♠ K532 ♥ Q87 ♦ 843 ♣ 964 East ♠ - ♥ 65432 ♦ 7652 ♣ 7532 South ♠ A4 ♥ AKJ109 ♦ AK10 ♣ AK10.

It may be but this makes the concept better.

Two hands of this type :1) West ♠ KJ109 ♥ KQJ98742 ♦ - ♣ 5 North ♠ A875432 ♥ - ♦ AKQJ10 ♣ A East ♠ Q ♥ 10653 ♦ 76 ♣ 876432 South ♠ 6 ♥ A ♦ 985432 ♣ KQJ109 (7 ♦ for N-S, 7♥ by W then 7NT by S). 2) West ♠ 532 ♥ AKQ109532 ♦ - ♣ 95 North ♠ 94♥ 6 ♦ Q82 ♣ AJ108743 East ♠ - ♥ J874 ♦ J10976543 ♣ 6 South ♠ AKQJ10876 ♥ - ♦ AK ♣ KQ2 Bidding:S 2♣ W 4♥ N 5♣ E(Ilyoucha Babovitch)6♣, 6♠ p p 7♥, X all pass.

Infact at a certain point is a matter to choise, i think necessarly, a convention (like these one) and i for better to define, has become in this way. There are ultheriors declarative situations to consider subsequently.

As told the aim is oriented in three ways: 1) to disturbe communications (i.e. 2♣ is generic or "any shape"); 2) to have possibly a sacrifice more economic (when are doubled); 3) at worst to try at make playing them to game level when there is a slam.

Yes, certainly that can have it and in this case partner will bid consequently (but you considered before this situation reversed).

I think that you agree. Yes, favoureble vulnerability helps surely and can allow to bid easier (and more) expecially by first opp (2♣ - ?(=first opp) ..-..) and partner can value how to continue if supporting (=bid level/n.r of supp. cards). Balanced or half-balanced hands with few points seem not be indicated to interfer while unbalanced are right for bidding. Actually we are talking only of these one to open dialogue.

About this argoument i have not found much. Although probably has to be much convenient to interefer with the aim to prevent informations in partnership. Infact, having a suit with 7/8 cards in a range of about 7/8 - 12/13 points and a top honor (or two) can be bid it at third level whilest with a suit more supported (three honors/+) the bidding can be taken at fourth level. How do you think about it ?

Is always so:the good things ..

The book of T. Reese could be available for free to read as "anteprime" in Google other. I want to say that the " French school " is a well suggest for you : "Total bridge" by Bertrand Romanet explain about planning and, subsquently when improved, you can read from this author another good book wrote about squeeze "Le squeeze au bridge".

Hands that are exported (from the web client) in editor hands are interesting generally speaking so this process should be facilitated. To do this we must act with several steps: Save in editor, create new folder, rename and then finally saves. Why it may not be possible with the same method used in the mails: when should be discarded one and end up in the trash for a limited time before being deleted permanently, there is a box to mark the email to delete. With the same system could be marked the hand to be exported directly into editor hands.

As i told in my previuos post, this point seems interesting. To have major clearness and not to follow in "abstract" way can be usefull to indicate the full hands and relatif bidding for these four different situations.

I also think that "GIB solver (near play buttom)" can interfer in that way but for yours second post part instead when watching score there was the full hand already revealed and more i have -anew just now- tryied to play it being dummy and it is happened again but this time when i get quickly(=hand cannot be finished ) table back there was another hand. Exit from "Play Anonim.." and reentering to follow to play was presented the same hand with the same resulting. This "previewble" is a bug or what ?

Just now Gib played with me 3NT and i had score open to see. Before it had finished to play in score there was already the resulting (3NT+1 for 10.8 imps). How is it possible ?

I think that here it being pass not negatif has to be interpreted as possibility that Gib (with a three-suits) can bid anything but cannot have right informations to decide.

http://bridge-game.info/learning-hub/for-improvers/341-high-level-competitive-bidding.html It is also to consider. The fact that is spoken about with pro and cons. can take thinking that this "tool" could have any value but that actaully is not well definited yet. I only can suggest to read, insert in Google search box "I Fought the Law", the first two pages indicating vary sites to know better this argoument with the two points of view.

Yes, with Chrome browser is offered the translater (than for BBO also). From infobridge homepage and then clicking "Conventions(=Convenzioni)", if may it to need (for translater), you can see: http://www.infobridge.it/Sezione_Convenzioni.htm

If you go and click on url indicated in post #14 and 15 (http:..post p 908836) about Avarelli conv.. When you open the second url (http:....Avarelli.htm) at bottom of page (under indice - index) there is the box "Select language" ( cliking on the other languages to choise for changing) and indication "Powered by Google Traduttore" (already indicated there in italian language).([seleziona lingua]is the box window then Powered by GoogleTraduttore copy and past)

I have saw just now. Thanks, is an URL rich for informations and fine to watch.