Jump to content

joker_gib

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    1,384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by joker_gib

  1. Yes, I'd also take an insurance in 5♥
  2. I think I'd double ! (not especially recommended with the void but maybe we belong to clubs !)
  3. Yes, this one won't be ruffed :P and I'll see the dummy
  4. I don't have the 3♦ bid in my system so I have to pass
  5. It would never cross my mind to pass this ! ;)
  6. I open 1♠ The hand is too good for any kind of jump in 4th seat, imo. We can still have more than 4♠ ! The same hand with ♥'s in place of ♠'s and the problem is not so straightforward.... What do you think ?
  7. For me 2♣ emphasizes clubs (and only clubs). Why do we need so many ways to show 2-suited hands in this auction? 2NT as 5-5 majors seems a pretty good start to me. For me, 2♣ is 2-suiter (weaker than 2NT) because the ♣ bidder is behind me. 2♦ stays natural (same for 2M on 1M) cause I'm behind the bidder of ♦
  8. At imps, I bid... Stayman + invite
  9. Yes, I do not see the ♠ fit... :huh: 4♥
  10. I bid 4♦ now but I'm really afraid I've shown a ♥ fit ! Where are we going !? :huh:
  11. Is that one so different that everybody was bidding 2♠ :huh: http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?showtopic=23718&hl=
  12. Also agree with 4♦ with this shape. If partner has only 5 cards, this is probably the last time he plays in front of me ! :rolleyes: :P
  13. Too weak for me to bid, I pass but not confident...
  14. If x is t/o as the majority of experts play this today : 4NT 2-suited
  15. Pass is obviously not forcing because I could have X with far less than what I have and I don't expect partner to X with a zero count ! I would go for 6♦
×
×
  • Create New...