joker_gib

Well, if I have agreed to play inverted raises I really don't see why I wouldn't bid 2♦ :)

Oops, missed it, sry ! Anyway, HB Phil ! ;)

3♣

Yes, I would have passed too.

1NT easy for me. Don't really see the advantages of 2♥ in a balanced hand :huh:

Hi John! Repeated transfers are what I'm interested in ! Do you always re-transfer with 5 cards in the major ? If you show a second suit, do you have 5M ? Could you post the detailed developments ?

Yes, 4NT should be natural here and 4♥ should agree ♦ to go further...

Not really but pay attention that a hands with ♦ longer than ♣ are also opened 1♣ ! (3-4)-4-2, (2-4)-4-3

It's not the case, opener gives strength first (18-19) and can still have 3 cards support.... I suppose that the most effective way is to play a structure with transfers which allows you to play 3M. As I don't want to reinvent the wheel, I'm asking the wonderful people of thsi wonderful forum ..... :P

Hi all! For those who are playing transfer walsh, what are your developments on the 2NT rebid ? 1♣ = all balanced hands excepted those with 5♦ 1♣ 1♦ = 4 cards ♥ + 2NT (18-19) ? 1♣ 1♥= 4 cards ♠ + 2NT (18-19) ? Thanks in advance !

With 2♥, I'm also a passer here.

1♠ is clear for me

Happy birthday, Matt !

Agree with 6♣

I would do the same. 2NT than 3♠ = invite with 4 trumps in my book.

1♠

Yes and they are betting between Italy and Netherlands and the result is already known : 3-0 ! :)

hum ! :P Did you read my post ? ;) :)

:( Both minor queens can be enough for 5♦ if the king is onside...

Double, planning to 3♦ :(

Totally agree with this ! :(

Never ! Even if I have a weak 2 in diamond I don't make preempts with 2 aces !

Yes, X now and pass before

Same for me ! And I also pass the X with west hand...

Agree