i agree with you Misho although would like to alter your comment a bit...copyright withstanding :P 'The director's decision can't be biased B) on individual characteristics of competitor and fail to make right bid, because lack of knowledge (in this case right hand evaluation) do not exuse the competitor.' The point i am making is that it is difficult for a director (esp. in local competitions/drives when most of players are familiar with each other's styles) to make a call on a particular hand by a particular competitor if that competitor has a tendency to make off-centre calls regularly, and judge it simply in the context of that particular hand in isolation. Also, my fellow Britain, cardsharp, made a valid point about the 2♣ psyche controversy, at least in UK. A hand similar to the one that started the thread came up in latter stages of national competition and aroused a lot of debate as to whether to strengthen the rules regarding a 'psyche' of a 2♣ opener (the person in question recently opened a 1NT with a 2 count and ended up making 1 trick (on a defensive error) hee hee... with opponents at other table in 6♠X -1 in a very reasonable contract: cost him the match) . Two nationally-recognised TDs who play at my club, and seem to have some sway in the corridors of power, cant agree on the matter B) so little chance of a resolution there !!! The crux of the argument seems to be as to what constitutes a GF bid and whether it is possible to remove any subjective assessment as to whether one is or not, which in itself, of course, is ludricrous. A player may make a 2♣ GF bid genuinelyassessing it as GF, irrespective of his/her level, whereas another person may never think it is. The operative word here is genuine in the sense that a person makes a bid knowing it is in breach of any law put forward... P.S. Misho i wish to disagree with you about Bulgaria being FREE!!! Bought a coffee in Sofia for 4.8 leva!!! :D: not FREE in my books. What was even more frustrating was that i had ordered a sandwich and a coke :D