cf_John0

1S will at risk of pass out,2C more suitable.

Moderate.

Let me try. (1)The responser want to reverse to 2S if the opener dont bid 1S; and (2)there is neither void nor single in hand; (3)Just concern the quality of trumps and side ctrls for a slam; At these kind of cases ,why dont u bid RKC 4NT?

pass xfer 2 penalty.

There are so much "components" to fossick, U can just DIY as a compatible PC

Kenneth had been cheated by his pd Stanned,now recites incorrectly.

I think 5♠ should indicate a solid ♠ suit without enough side ctrls,otherwise 4♠ first.So i would bid 6♠.

Pass 'cause of formerly pass!

The dummy's hand has proved the passive opening lead is right.

♥8

Impossible to a slam, but almost a game-dont need tell ur opps u have another major suit.

No! not only for Vul but also for pd.

I agree with Ron.

3H is superior for this type of hand-ctrls & HCPs both more.

Almost nobody will pass a 2DX without anything in his hand,so I'll take dbl.

Further 5D for 4S or defense against 3NT/5C/... Dont agree to 4D,but consider 2NT as a wait.

When we played Gerber, the group of us had a convention that anytime any jumping or direct 4C over opening NT is Gerber. For this hand,Considering of Splinter will lead the bidding to a rough way. Does anyone agree with me?

It's obvious that there is some misfit on this deck, and impossible to further a slam. The best bid, I think, is 4S to sign off: (1),4H is impossible better than 4S; (2),3NT will be hard to complete; (3),4D is too strong for this hand. TY!

First Stayman 3C for 4 card-H; then Gerber 4C for slam; the last contract will be 6H/6NT.