Lurpoa

♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ May I suggest to use other media to discuss your ♥-questions. ♥♥♥

Sexist and not to the point.

♥ ♥ That is nice, thank you ♥

♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥ Thanks, yes we learned something about your world. Not sure we want to be part of that world of FYP and oh(!) FYOM..... I myself, was teached by my grand-dad that "bridge is a sport for gentlemen". Gentlemen use words to speak....whether it is English, French or Hindi....or whatever...certainly when they communicate on an international forum, and they do not make fun of people when they happen not to understand their slang. So please take more care when you write something here. Yes, we l♥ve you all ♥♥♥♥♥

♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥ We understand now.... FYP was as Tamoel for us. But you are right, people should try to be more clear in what they write, and not alway say "I agree" or "no, I do not agree". They should be more friendly... too much agressiveness here.... don't you think so ? Yes, we agree with you, and believe that things should change.... We l♥ve you all. ♥♥♥♥♥ PS: We got feedback from some friends, that at least our postings are giving some colour to this forum. Most of them love the formatting, and think it makes things much easier to read.... ♥♥♥

♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ ♥ NO. ♥ We did not write this. ♥ Somebody changed the words. ♥♥♥

♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥ WHY ? ♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥ ♥ Why ? ♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ The introduction to the paragraph, you are quoting, sets the general framework (the default) to understand the specic cases, for which you are looking for examples. QUOTE BWS2001: When a call could logically be interpreted as either forcing or nonforcing and there is no explicit agreement: In general: In a competitive situation, treat as nonforcing; in a non-competitive situation, treat as forcing or nonforcing by which seems more sensible to the observer. UNQUOTE And yes, we agree, that "which seems more sensible to the observer", is not a very "scientific" rule. It asks for good understanding of common bidding practices and of BWS2001 in particular. This BWS2001-paragraph is trying to solve a very delicate and very rare problem when we cannot "logically interprete the bid as either forcing or nonforcing ". You should be aware that with all the guidelines given in BWS2001, those situations are very rare. If still there is any doubt, this paragraph is trying to give further guidelines, of which not the less important; competitive versus non-competitive. Rather than we trying to find examples, of cases, which "you" cannot interprete (we cannot think for you) - we hope you do undertand this-, it would be better that you submit us the sequences you cannot interprete, with all the help the BWS-document is providing. ♥♥♥ PS: We are unable to read you bidding diagrams. They are too small. Is there anybody else who has that same problem ? Why is that ? ♥♥♥

♥♥♥ ♥ WHY ? ♥♥♥

♥♥♥ ♥I do not like your language. ♥♥♥

♥♥♥ I am looking for a friendly and ambitious partner for regular play on BBO I like to play BWS2001Defaults, but would be most happy to agree on any other well outlined and consistent system. I would very much like to integrate some of the Robson-Segal ideas into it. My bidding style is naturally constructive, and prefer partners with that style. In general, and without special agreements, my openings, overcalls, raises, etc. are always 'sound'. But on the other side, I would be most happy to agree on and test the Robson-Segal Pressure Bidding Theory. And... bridge is a very simple game, it is just that people (me too...) overcomplicate it..... ♥♥♥

♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥ Yes ! ♥ Would have loved to hear why somebody like harp would bid 4♥ ♥ Can you help ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ So, why do you LOL ? ♥♥♥ ♥♥ ♥

♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ WHY ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ WHY ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ WHY ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Why ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and also Ladinski

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Yes,we agree that you agree...

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥[hearts WHY ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ THEN, WHY SAY MORE ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ WHY ?

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Hi, yes. Nice to hear your reasoning. Thanks, seems very plausible what you are saying. Just, please.... try to use a little friendlier words: the world will be the better by it.

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Why ?