MTSummit
Members-
Posts
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by MTSummit
-
在**所致污浊不堪的*人网络桥牌环境,这样大规模的比赛能结束就是奇迹。特此发来贺电。
-
1M 2m 3M means for me: trump is decided even if partner has void in my suit. and of course additional strength and slam interest. 1M 2m 4M sounds like a hand with less HCPs than normal open (like 9-10) with a solid 7+ suit
-
New Tourney Tool - Completion Rate Filter
MTSummit replied to Rain's topic in BBO Tournament Directors Forum
a nice idea! -
a question about option "exclude new members"
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in BBO Tournament Directors Forum
Thanks for information. That was exactly what I want... Some rude/crazy persons are obviously trying to disturb our regular tourney. I just hope this option will not affect on those who are in my welcome list but happen to be a "new" member -
Tourney Filter tweak - Include Players from Host Country
MTSummit replied to uday's topic in BBO Tournament Directors Forum
so this is the answer why my tourney can not include Chinese memebers only. (I'm a Chinese living in Germany, who create regularly tourney for Chinese players) is there any other option to allow exceptions (besides friends or local list)? thanks! -
does that mean 2♥ was weak? i might go for 3♠
-
totally agree with jdonn
-
maybe i would risk a transfer to 2♠ then bid 2NT. if partner bid 3♠ i would bid 4♠, if partner bid 3NT i would bid 4♦
-
a difficult choice, need your opinion
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
yeah it is a big problem, and it happened in my game, i kept thinking for long and made a 2♣ and prayed... fortunately my p then bid 2♥ :) i know pass is not a bad decision, just was afraid that my partner could have some points and would not dare to make balance bid, and we might lost a game. -
What is your favorite system over strong 2NT ?
MTSummit replied to bluecalm's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
3♣: puppet stayman 3♦: have 4 card major(s) 3♥/3♠: have 5 card major 3NT: no 4+ majors 3♦/3♥: transfer, can show SI with new suit 3♠: minor stayman with both minors or weak 6+ diamonds 3NT: no 4+ minors 4♣: 4+ clubs, possibly 4 diamonds also 4♦: 4+ diamonds, denies 4+ clubs 3NT: puppet to 4♣ after 4♣: pass with weak 6+ clubs or show 3 suits SI by cue the short suit -
a difficult choice, need your opinion
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
thanks for all advices, all "x"s are smaller than 9... -
if the double of opp shows both majors, i would think 2S after redouble is forcing
-
4C looks much too brave for me, even if 2H shows a strong hand... as 2/1 GF south has a quite minimum hand. i would bid 3NT instead of 2NT after 2H, if north corrects to 4S, then pass
-
Vul. both east opens 1♣ you have: ♠KQ ♥AQxx ♦KQxx ♣xxx what would you do? pass? (reluctance for me with 16 points) double? (i don't like cause only 2 spades, although 2 honors) 1NT? (not safe without club stopper if we would possibly go to 3NT and west would probably lead club) i personally chose to overcall 1D, what do you think? thanks & regards
-
pass >> 2c > double for me. your partner didn't bid 1NT nor negative double, i would not be too surprised if opps would bid 4H after balance
-
agree, i like 2D as game forcing xyz in this case
-
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
You lose a lot of pretty valuable ground playing this method. Go with the standard that others have suggested, I would think better. But it is your system:) Ya I mean do your really want to play in some 5-2 minor fit or even a 5-3 minor fit at the 3 level with your example hand: 1nt=2c 2d=3minor? i'm not sure about this, i just feel, if i had to play 5-3 or even 5-2 fit 3m contract, it was unlikely that 2NT was better with that unbalanced hand. -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
You lose a lot of pretty valuable ground playing this method. Go with the standard that others have suggested, I would think better. But it is your system:) y sure, at least i should know the standard way. that's why i made this thread and asked for help. as for the new way i found, it was a surprise :P -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
But since you play that a direct 1N-3♣ is invitational with a good suit, you can settle for bidding other 1-suited minor invites (with bad suits) via a 2N invitation. This frees up stayman+3m as forcing. there's difference 1nt 3c/3d the invitational strength lies only in C suit, and promises a good 6+ suit with 2 honors. like xxx xx xx AQxxxx or Qx xxx xx KQxxxx 1nt 2c 2x 3c/3d is normal invitational like Qxxx Kxx x KJxxx or something similar? right so you need to give up inv with a scattered hcp and a long minor bidding your way. How you invite with that hand is 2c and then 2nt. 2c and then 3 of minor is natural and game forcing. Neither promises a 4 card major. well, i'd use 2NT as a balanced invitational hand and 3m as an unbalanced one. but as a friend pointed out, i really care too much about invitational ones :P -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
That's very much along the lines of Walsh Relay. I think originally 3m (in your double relay auction) showed 1/3 top honors, 3M showed the corresponding minor with 2/3 top cards, and 3N showed 3/3 top honors in an unspecified minor (but opener should be able to tell). thx, i didn't know the name is Walsh relay. but i will not really use its original meaning after 2NT, i'd use them as natural bids. 3C/3D = strong GF minor suit 3H = inv. 4/5(+) majors 3S = GF 5/5 majors etc. i hope it will work :P -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
i found one solution from a friend for my system: 1NT 2D 2H 2S 2NT 3m 2D as forcing transfer (relay) to 2H, 2S as another forcing transfer to 2NT then 3C/3D is game forcing minor anyway, thx all for nice suggestion -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
1nt 2c 2x 3c i feel this 3c sounds invitational, not game forcing It's game forcing. I mean what are you really asking, "how can I show a game forcing hand with a minor if I make my system so every minor suit bid is invitational?" Well, you can't, you have to make some of them forcing. perhaps i didn't make my question clearly the question should be, a game forcing hand with single strong minor suit :) -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
But since you play that a direct 1N-3♣ is invitational with a good suit, you can settle for bidding other 1-suited minor invites (with bad suits) via a 2N invitation. This frees up stayman+3m as forcing. there's difference 1nt 3c/3d the invitational strength lies only in C suit, and promises a good 6+ suit with 2 honors. like xxx xx xx AQxxxx or Qx xxx xx KQxxxx 1nt 2c 2x 3c/3d is normal invitational like Qxxx Kxx x KJxxx or something similar? -
problem: GF with strong minor suit after 1NT open
MTSummit replied to MTSummit's topic in Natural Bidding Discussion
1nt 2c 2x 3c i feel this 3c sounds invitational, not game forcing
