patroclo

It is significative that there aren't any turkish player comment. I understand that. And this has a great mean for me........

An other question: When one organize a team match, he can't open another one till the precedent team match has finished. It would be useful, if the director has finished to play, to give him the opportunity to restart a new table without waiting that the other table finishes all the hands.

I think that also in the normal tables there are some people that are chating with skipe. Distrust by pair from the same nation that play slow.

Not a great book

Many thanks. I order it

i think that i follow the suggestion of Barman, to read description of hands in newspaper or blog of bridge. Maybe comparing the different results in tournment played by different team

Yes The meaning of my post is this

Is there a book that compare different bidding methodes on a single hand. To analize pro and con on some conventions and when is better one or the other. Example with this hand [hv=pc=n&n=st532hkt97dk74ckt&d=w&v=n&b=12&a=ppp1hp]133|200[/hv] 3♥ inviting 1♠ showing before the 4th in spade 2♣ Drury 3♣ Bergen raises 2♥ inviting

To day an opp has made an impossible contract. The dummy has gone away and a gib substituted him. The declarer then abbandoned the play at 3 cards of the end. The hand was stopped attending the substitutes, because also gib disappeared,our pair has to waiting a lot to go on. It would be suitable to have two gib playing till the end of the hand gigi

And a dbl after a second bid at 2 level. How has to be interpreted ? 1s-pass-2h-dbl

May someone tell me when the fourth of hand may bid, after an open and a reply by opponent ? Ex: 1m pass 1M ? When to pass or to double or to bid something. Thanks

After 1 club- 2 nt (11 points) 3 clubs. Is it to pass or forcing ? Is it correct to go to 4 c with 3 cards of club ?

After a bid 1 spade - 1 nt 2 club - 2 heart are these 2 h forcing or not?

Have you analized all the teams participating to Bermuda Bowl or only those coming from european continent ?

If great champions are cheating with simple methods and are discovered now because there are video and audio record and a way to analize many hands with computer. How tell me that also the old stars of bridge didn't make the same ? Bad days for bridge

Senza Parole

Thanks

partners bid: After:pass- 1 color new color- ? Is this forcing or one may pass

After that 3 players abbandon the game. Does it exist a way to save an hand partially played ?

I am speaking on bbo game. It happened that an opp claimed instead than concede all the tricks during a slam. Declarer accepted, but after there wasn't any way to correct the mistake.

Sometimes an opp claims all the tricks while these are all of the declarer. I think that also the dummy have to accept not only the declarer. Because 2 players control the claim better than 1

[hv=pc=n&s=sq653hq5daqt97c54&w=s842hjt762dj6ck63&n=sajt7hk83dk85cqj9&e=sk9ha94d432cat872&d=e&v=0&b=14&a=1c1d1h]399|300[/hv]

Round Robin final results Wbridge5 104.47 Jack 96.30 Micro Bridge 92.66 Q-Plus Bridge 68.25 Shark Bridge 67.95 Bridge Baron 58.23 Goto Bridge 41.62 RoboBridge 30.52 Semifinal matches: Wbridge5 (+11.5) vs Q-Plus Bridge Jack vs Micro Bridge Final KO Wbridge5 vs Jack Jack crowned world robot champion Final KO Jack defeated Wbridge5 165 - 148

Looking on the team tournments score , i have seen that for winning is better gain many point guessing a slam or doubling a wrong contract by the opps in a few hands than winning many hands with little point. So i think that a pair of players should learn a system of declaration aimed to these model of contract (slam and double) for winning tournment. It would be useful to prize also the number of hands than one has played better of the opps for not making disparity. Sorry for my english language