lalislol

:unsure: Pandas are cute to all people, I think...be difficult to take offence at this. You'll get used to our commentators' humor. They're never intentionally offensive {except maybe to each other at times :-)) }, but can make human errors...easy to do considering the wide cultural diversity of the VG audience, eh? And I think most will make allowance for that.

Well...I guess it could be said that Roland is doing a pretty fair job at this. But I'd like to know who will pay for the new, LARGER hat he will require as a result of the superlatives you kiddies are using. PS WELL DONE, ROLAND!

1) Regarding changes to BBO, I personally see no reason to add chat boxes, or do a re-write, or whatever...BBO works great as it is, and we are all thankful that it is here. [but, then again, I still think Goren is alive, so what do I know? :-)) ] 2) Regarding the 'Cavendish Affair', I was annoyed by the stodgy presentation which replaced my usual, anticipated entertainment...probably have been spoiled by Roland and his excellent stable of commentators. Am very happy to note that all realize how much we owe Roland and his crew...we all look forward to feasting on their efforts many times in the future. But it's time to stop beating that dead horse, to paraphrase Fred.

1) At the risk of being repetitious, I must add my SPLENDID! to the Camrose presentation...excellent site reports, and almost fault-free. The operators deserve a hugh round of applause...did absence of screens make their job easier I wonder? 2) And even more repetiously, thank you, Roland, for displaying your remarkable organizational ability yet again...wonder how many specs realize their indebtedness to you? 3) On the subject of screens, they interfere with my philosophy: BIOAG...were not used when I started playing tourn bridge, despite the Reese affair. Were our ethics that much better 'way back then'? :P