Dragan

Exactly how I said : convert to all formats is possible in both direction !!(you can do it with program BFC)

I found excellent MS DOS program by Richard Pavlicek. Name of the programm is RPD. In addition there are converter ( BFC programm) to all knewn formats + Very usefull examples and excellent documentation. Program generate random deals same as preselected. Player's are very satisfied with Tournaments at BBO with this hands. I still can't solve problem with Excluding enemies of the host, since althought i set it to exclude ...they come in... :-(( Dragan

I found excellent MS DOS program by Richard Pavlicek. Name of the programm is RPD. In addition there are converter ( BFC program) to all knewn formats + Very usefull examples and excellent documentation. Program generate random deals same as preselected. Player's are very satisfied with Tournaments at BBO with this hands. I still can't solve problem with Excluding enemies of the host, since althought i set it to exclude ...they come in... :-(( Dragan

I like to generate random and completely specified hand's. I try to generate this hands with Big Deal but without succes. Format PBN is OK, but this program generate just one hand per start and hand is random. Dragan

Thx, I already watch TOPIC you recomended and do not find acceptable solution; Well, maybe I not precisly define what I want. How to generate preselected deals and include that deals in my BBO tournament ♥ IN 2-3 min ♥ Dragan

I do not knew how to solve two problems: 1. How to include preselected hands in my tournament ? How I can generate them ? 2. Althought I set to my tournament Restricted for enemies - they are in my Tournament ??!! thx in Advance, Dragan

Right line of play as it is started. 3nt=5♣+3♥+1♠ So after 9♣ 10♣ K♣ x♣, Best line is to play jack spade to Ace (or king) and again impass Club. Actually best line of play find inqury. But later he little change his plan. All others will go down since RHO had ♣QJTx ♦AQxx), so after taking his first ♣trick he will swith to !♦ Thanks all.

2♣

If ♣ is 4-1 at your back I think declarer is down 90%.

I wish to thank you inqury. :D This is very pleasant way to shed the light into the case. This is way how we should discuss. I suppouse we all learn something. This is my last message to this TOPIC.

Side which you call giant measure 5-6 people times 5-6 same post's. Yes they are experts, but self alone "experts". Some of them are greather expert than Cohen or Stevenson. I would add, they are "experts" to use wrong assymtions. As Makiaveli said "Target is..." There are one flower, we call him narcis. Quote smelt on that flower.

Wrong is assymption that I ask to someone support me. I just set this TOPIC to hear opinions. But some people ( suppouse from one BBO club) come here to crash this disscusion. Why I conclude that: becouse they use same terminology, same argument and repeat his idea's several times. This is some kind of market of TOPICS, so if it is bored to someone or not interesting...simply go to the other topics and this will die at the end of stack.

[hv=d=s&v=n&n=sak963hqj6dt93c94&s=sjhak9dk75cak8765]133|200|Scoring: IMP contract: 3nt by S lead: x ♥,Q♥ take trick (RHO card 3♥ ); 9♣ covered with T♣, which you take with K♣ (LHO card 2♣)[/hv] How you continue ? P.S. Full hand will be shown at the end

Yes Nikos, You had absolutely right. Point is : in all natural based systems with 5c-4d you open 1c.

To D and R, My answer to Jola is related to Natural based system's. Where I said that answer is related with WJ ? That can conclude everyone with basic knowledge of WJ. I hope other's will read carefull. IF YOU USE FALSE ASSYMPTIONS YOU CAN PROVE EVERYTHING. Using red colours will not make some statements true. Pls, I started this TOPIC. If you do not like my TOPIC, simply do not answer and TOPIC will go to the bottom of the stack. :lol: :) B)

With 5c - 4d you can open always 1c. your pd can than bid: a. 1d - b. 1h/s/1nt c. 2c if he bid a. with 16+ you bid 3d, with 16- you bid 2d if he bid b. with 16+ you bid 2d with 16- you bid 2c (1nt rare) or pass in case 1nt bid. If pd isn't minimal he will bid once more so you can show your 4d case c. is simply :-)

To Ron, Again Ron your antypathy to me do not allow you to read last latter. If you carefully read, you should notice : I ask to we discuss about my dillema's, not about BBO club's. If it is case that my dillema's bore someone, let he pls do not read this TOPIC. You told us your opinion. Why you repeat the same? Do you believe that infinitely repeating statement make statement true ? Your logic system use false induction method. If something is true for 1,2,3,4 we can't conclude that it is always true. If you use false assumptions, you can canclude whatever you want. Im my country we call it demagogy.

I think that penalty is to high. Maximum penalty should be procedural warning. Dragan

[quote name='Dragan [hv=d=e&v=n&n=sajt64ha87dq87ca3&w=s9532hk62dt4ct952&e=skh954daj96ckj864&s=sq87hqjt3dk532cq7]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] Bidding: E S W N 1♦ Pass Pass X 2♣ 2♥ 3♣ Pass Pass 3NT Pass Pass Pass Result: 3NT -2 Facts: 1) opps not alert 1♦ bid' date=' althought it is limited to 11-18HCP and can hold longer suit than [di'] 2) opps not alert 2♣ bid, althought it can be canape and when it is canape it is 11-15HCP, which is actually 3) Information that E/W pair play WJ2000 N/S got after bidding is finished, S player isn't familiar with WJ2000 4) N/S apealed 5) director leave reached result Dillema's : 1) If opening bid include some specific hand like Canape, alert or not 2) If bid include or exclude some specific type of hand, alert or not 3) If previous is true, what is the sanction vs that players and what about their oponents With Regards, Dragan Pls folk's. I set this TOPIC's to we discuss one opening bid and one sequence bid's in polish club system. Let we pls discuss about this. If you want to discuss about BBO club's, pls open such TOPICS. Dragan.

Mr Ingury, Quote is proof that I had right. What is pls private latter if it is not one to one? My latter is sended to only one person, second person show that latter to public. Advanced bridge player knew that there are no judge who will protect his bad bidding&playing. Someone here input me that I ask better result to me, althought I bid wrong. That's not true, true is that I'am asking to opps be punished becouse no alert. I don't like to this discussion go to the same direction as previous three. This is my final message to this TOPIC. With Regards, Dragan

I'am mathematician and maybe it is professional deformation, but proof which is offered to me about equality isn't enough. And althought I had nothing to hide, one member of group XXXXXXX use my private latter same as few others use my name in bad context. Same group of people sent messages to my topics about new BBO club with only one target: to crash my idea. Do you intervene ? How ? Dragan P.S. I checked my statements on high level of WBF. For some I had wrong, but for some I had right.

I believe in freedom of speech. I do not understand worries about variety of Topics and directions where they go. Only measure for some topic's should be number of reader's. I suppuse that company BBO had same measure. Only limit which should be seted is gentle speech. Few event's and discussions here help me. I learn something new. I change my opinion about some things. On few other's I consolidate my opinions. Condition for that is to be criticized or supported without limit. However, I feel one bad thing here which can be expressed with " we are all equal, but some are more equal". Pls prove me that previous isn't true. With Regards, Dragan

terrible....what does it mean ? I'am not tolerant ? 1. I listen very carefull all posters 2. I listen and polish players with whom I play WJ 3. But I also read official book for WJ by Jassem where is wroted " 1• Opening Description: (a) 12-17 HCP with at least 5 diamonds, or any 4-4-4-1 with 4 diamonds (:) 12-14 HCP, 4 diamonds and 5 clubs Variant (a) Opening 1• can have a balanced hand and 5 diamonds (5-3-3-2) holding only 12-14 HCP, since we need 15-17 HCP to open 1N. The unbalanced hands with 5 diamonds as well as 3-suiters (4-4-4-1) we open 1• with wider-strength: 12-17 HCP. Variant (B) With 4 diamonds and 5 clubs we open 1• with at most 14 HCP. With stronger we open 1 and follow by rebidding clubs, showing 15 HCP and 5 clubs, and partner can try still to inquire for a 4-card diamond suit." 4. I do not proclaim my opinion as absolutely true, I said it is my conclusion, my opinion, for the difference to the some people here. 5. If someone had better argument or majority is on the other side, i should accept that. 6. Someone said "5% is only knewn to yourself", if that person is so smart let he exactly count that possiblity. Dragan

mistakes? Even it is true what you say, pls note next 1. probabilty of 5-3-3-2 is about 9% 2. hands like: AQ KJx Qjx and ♦xxxxx or AQ KJX AQx ♦xxxxx I suppuse you open either 1c either 1nt so my conclusion is : posibility to 1d be balanced is below 5% and worth to alert as UNBALANCED Dragan

Note: 1. I remind You, Nothing is alerted, explanation come at the and of bidding 2. Do we analyze best scenario to the quilty side or something else ? Dragan