sakuragi

bd 24 As N, would you have passed partner X or retreat to 2♦? As N, would you be able to duck the ♣ at trick 2? though gib tells it yet makes. (seems i could not launch poll within thread, or could I?)

Could try Helene+sakuragi as both have committed to play?

I would like to play. happy to play with anyone. tks

There are 2 options show me new content since my last visit show me all content that i have not read Is it something configurable to add "show me new contents within last 24 hours"?

Dano. he sat in on this hand. stealing my concentration offering me a reason for the poor play ... lol

Bd 16 Have nothing to say with my play. On the actual low ♥ lead, the hand is makeable. Essentially inserting a middle♥, and using ♥A latter to weaken opp trump saving a trick. At the table dano offered me 2nd chance by following low on 2nd ♥.... Should have taught him a lesson lol ....

Bd 6 At the table wish to put partner in for a diamond lead. Thinking that could not be done with 4th ♣, did it at 3rd ♣ ... but then I killed my partner trump winner (or you may say my ♣Q winner). and the diamonds are not going away.

Someone says there are similarities between bridge game and investment ....

Like to play. Happy to play with anyone

In my school, 1C-1H-3H is 15-17ish 4 card ♥ support, responder could pass ....

You come across rude behavior some time. No big deal. you could report to BBO. Came to know that prior warning would be given for 1st time offenders being reported, before banning accounts for certain amount of time. I would recommend zero tolerance. they could be repeated offenders, just not being reported. it simplifies your procedures. no need to monitor after report. a ban of e.g. 7 days would not lose many customers. helps build better atmosphere. player being reported could appeal.

Bd 6

so for the 10+ ones Bd 13 Not sure indeed we are in j2N. Bd 18 Plain stupid by me. may work out in regular games. but i should better more frequent reminding who the opps are, if i get another chance playing. Bd 19 opps are damn good Bd 28 probably want to be aggressive in final board.

I would like to play. Happy to play with anyone. :lol:

[hv=pc=n&s=skqj986haktd98ck2&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1sp1np]133|200[/hv]

would be there at match time. see u all then. :lol:

have we got enough players? I would like to play. Happy to play with anyone. :lol:

Does the local bridge body has the authority to do this?

sakuragi + 0wcli :lol:

nice stuff :lol: :lol:

Confession ..... Bd3: Should have guessed the ♥, with all other honors shown already. S holding ♠K ♥Q vs S holding ♠K ♥A. 7 imps lost. Bd5: Though we missed the ♣ ruff, should be able to avoid endplay by exiting with small ♥. 15 imps lost. Bd7: Should not pass 1♥ with KJJ plus quite a few Ts. 10 imps lost. would you pass? Bd16: opps 4♠ should be cold. But didn't put declarer into real test. Ducking 1st ♥ as in other table would make declarer much more uncomfortable. Returning ♠Q after ♥A would also post some more threat. 10 imps lost. Bd17: should have press on with 4♣. Note jec didn't X 3♦. Is jec that good? 8 imps lost. Bd20: would you X 3♣ by N? Compare with Bd17? Though I would be endplayed in 3♣X, I would only need to break 1 major. 3♣X likely -2. 10 imps lost. Interesting hands ... hope to get another chance.

I would be around anyway at the match time. It would be my pleasure to play with diana :lol: :lol:

I am available. :lol: Play std 2/1 or sayc. happy to play with anyone. :lol:

I would like to play. :lol: :lol:

ok with me.