rsteele
Full Members-
Posts
51 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by rsteele
-
When partner can't double 3C you are not earning any matchpoints defending that contract. A bid is obvious and the real question is what to bid? As I am in front of the 3C bidder a double is for takeout and should imply diamond support while a three heart bid is unilateral in scope. As for 2H over one D that is not my style but I will not argue that it is ineffective.
-
-
-
I’m Convinced – It’s Time to Dump Jacoby 2NT
rsteele replied to 32519's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
Try 1H - 2NT (Jacoby) 3H - 3S (cue bids follow) 4C - 4D 5C - responder count now count 12 tricks. 5 hearts, 5 clubs and two side aces. Why is this hand a Jacoby problem? -
It might interest you to know that Barry Crane did use Drury after 1st and 2nd seat openers
-
You hold: T73, KQT9, 654, A97 vul vs not at imps (victory points) your pd, in 4th chair opens one heart, RHO passes. Do you or do you not use and form of Drury?
-
I do believe that the traditional usage of sandwich NT provides to much information on hands that you are seldom the declarer. I have, however with better hands, had great success using the bid only differently defined. "Sanwhich" shows a two level overcall in the lower unbid suit with a tolerance for the 4th suit. So 1D - P - 1H - 1NT may hold KQX, XXX, X, AQJXXX. While with AQXX, XXX, X, AQXXX I will simply make a TO double. With the freak two suited hand : KQTXX, XX, X, KQJXXX I will bid 2NT. I have given up a lot of info but at least taken up considerable bidding space. Obviously if you are a passed hand the parameters for the bid change.
-
A very well thought out 4 club call. Assume you had set up the forcing pass situation with a 3 Diamond bid. Now over 5 clubs the double would usually portend two losing clubs and that is not what you care about. After 4 clubs ( which should be control showing as you could have bid diamonds or spades) the emphasis shifts to the unbid suit. I think the double shows two or more losing spades and now the remainder of the hand must be solid for you to make 6 hearts.
-
With a pick-up pard I assume up the line responses so I play one spade as natural and 2S as 4th suit. If, however, playing Walsh Pard will not have a 4 cd spade suit when he responds one diamond so one spade may have alternative meanings. To make matters worse you don't know if the 4th suit is a game force or a one round force. Get a regular pd and avoid these problems.
-
Assume that one NT shows 6-10 HCP's with either 3-3-4-3 or 3-3-3-4 distribution. I am known to have a 10 card fit in clubs and now a 3 1/2 loser hand. With that in mind 3NT looks a tad conservative so the choices seem to be between some number of clubs (is 4 forcing?), a cue bid or 3 hearts both of which are certainly forcing. Since I am willing to play a minimum of five clubs I will bid 3 hearts and over the expected 4 club response bid 4 spades partner should now recognize a diamond problem and be able to reach a sensible conclusion. I do admit that even 5 clubs may be on a finesse but to paraphrase the Bard "faint heart neer screwed the cook".
-
Short matches require big scores - the only big score available for your side is 4S's. Bid it like a man.
-
How should bidding gone?
rsteele replied to dickiegera's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
I am not in love with redouble and 4 diamonds is beyond the pale but what were you waiting for over three hearts? In any good partnership each person should examine his (or her) own bidding first. -
How should bidding gone?
rsteele replied to dickiegera's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
-
With no interference you hold vul at imps Q83, AT, T9652, 973 your pd opens one natural club, you respond one diamond and pd bids one spade: your call?
-
Stuff happens. At imps the rewards are so great that East will find partner with JXX or TXXX or simply not get a spade lead that not making an effort for the NT game is cowardly. Those looking for perfection should try chess. No great fault, play the next hand.
-
treatments with the longest history
rsteele replied to mikl_plkcc's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
Five Card Majors, Foster echos, most std leads, weak two bids, idea of preemptive bidding takeout(Mc Campbell) doubles. Rule of 11, though not a convention was common. -
treatments with the longest history
rsteele replied to mikl_plkcc's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
-
intentionally misleading bidding
rsteele replied to amre_man's topic in General Bridge Discussion (not BBO-specific)
He's 86 and having fun - get over it. -
Read the intro to "How to win a duplicate bridge" by Marshall Miles. Then make your choice - bridge or a family picnic.
