Jump to content

Bot suggestion


Recommended Posts

The bots play very quickly with only one card in a suit. Here is a hand where that info was vital.

 

[hv=d=s&v=e&n=s83hq32daj9863cq9&w=sk9542ht754dqt7c5&e=sj76hk6d5cjt87632&s=saqthaj98dk42cak4]399|300|Scoring: IMP

West North East South

 

 -     -     -     2NT

 Pass  6    Pass  7NT

 Pass  Pass  Pass  

 

[/hv]

 

I have been experimenting playing with the robots a bit. Here is a problem for them. Ok, my 7NT was pushy but I had no idea what the bot bids 6D on. Here I won club lead, cashed diamond king and lead a low diamond. The gib on my left tanked. They play singletons quickly so I found the diamond Queen. AFTER gib on right had 7 clubs, probably find it anyway.

 

C5 CQ CT C4

C9 C2 CA S2

DK D7 D3 D5

D2 DT DJ C3 <-- Gib on left tanked

HQ HK HA H5 <-- still need luck

HJ H4 H2 H6 <-- set up possible vienna coup

CK S5 S3 CJ <-- continue plan

D4 DQ DA S6

D9 C7 ST S9

D8 C8 H8 H7

D6 C6 H9 S4

S8 S7 SA SK <-- see odds, hook versus drop

SQ HT H3 SJ

 

When i lead the spade at trick 12, i knew West had been 5-4-3-1 or an odd 6-3-3-1. If he was 6-3-3-1, then I was going down, as EAST last card must be the heart TEN. So, West was down to 1H and 1S. I can always make if i guess who has the spade king. If East has it, I play the queen. If West has it, I play the ace. Since West had 5S to East's three, I went with the odds and played the ACE...

 

But without the "tell-tale" bot glitch in diamonds, surely i would be down. The vienna coup was just icing taking advantage of the opportunity. Thus, i think we need to program small delay in playing with stiffs since they will delay when not having a stiff. This picked up 13.8 imps for me (ok, ok, after finding EAST with 7 clubs, i was going to hook diamond anyway, but the hesitation made the play 100%, so you get the idea).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I guess, a deluge of questions will pore over Fred after GIBs enter the play. Fred can't say much about the bridge behavior of the bots and can hardly do anything. The author is Matt Ginsberg, and he's not active (on GIB).

 

Arguably, _all_ possible questions have already been discussed in the GIB forum at

http://lists.gibware.com/pipermail/discuss/

Try to search your question there.

 

For example, the fast play of singletons was discussed for more than 1/2 year, various tricks were tested in 3-4 GIB versions, and no feasible solution was found...

 

A few GIB features that will raise not one brow and were not solved during GIB's active development:

- discarding of high spots;

- nebulous signalling;

- jumping to slams without control asking;

- long thinking on apparent non-issues;

- generally slow bidding and play (if you want it to play better).

 

Much of the above is rooted in the approach of Matt who put the emphasis on _simulations_ both in card play and bidding as opposed to _external_ bridge wisdom, i.e. expert bridge experience programmed as rules.

 

That being said, I believe GIB will make a formidable adversary for the _advanced_ player and less at BBO. If Fred adjusts the interface to show meanings of the human partner bids before they are made, GIB will be also a strong partner.

 

Mind that GIB is launched and plays on _your_ PC, not on the server. Thus its play level depends on your local power. Try to give GIB as much time as you can bear :lol:.

 

Vlado

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...