Jump to content

DO U OPEN AND IF SO, WHAT?


Recommended Posts

Even if playing Ekren 2D or similar, this isn't the hand for it.

 

I think I'll pass this one. Singleton K isn't worth much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, those of you who say you would open this with a weak opening bid showing majors, are you talking of some Ekren showing 4+/4+? I never got it how people can be happy to open this with 4-4, 5-4, 6-4 or 6-6...

 

I would either open this 2, then later bid 3 voluntarily, or pass and bid Michaels later.

 

Arend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally a use for that useless diamond king. Take teh diamond King away, and the hand is the same. The difference is, in the US, opening 1S on the hnad without the diamond king is "illegal" (with 6 hcp), but with the diamond king, you can open 1S (9 hcp). What a silly rule.

 

With misho I would open 1S, with some other partners, I would pass planning on bidding later when one bid will show tis hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally a use for that useless diamond king. Take teh diamond King away, and the hand is the same. The difference is, in the US, opening 1S on the hnad without the diamond king is "illegal" (with 6 hcp), but with the diamond king, you can open 1S (9 hcp). What a silly rule.

I think that actually, you're allowed to open that hand 1 in the US, but not to have the AGREEMENT to open that hand 1. If you see what I mean. This may or may not add tot he silliness. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally a use for that useless diamond king. Take teh diamond King away, and the hand is the same. The difference is, in the US, opening 1S on the hnad without the diamond king is "illegal" (with 6 hcp), but with the diamond king, you can open 1S (9 hcp). What a silly rule.

I think that actually, you're allowed to open that hand 1 in the US, but not to have the AGREEMENT to open that hand 1. If you see what I mean. This may or may not add tot he silliness. :lol:

I'm interested to know what would happen in US:

you have:

xxxxxx

AJxxxx

x

-

 

And you open 1S.

You don't have an agreement with your partner about this and normally you open with 12 HCP (can go till 10 with more distribution).

 

Question: Is opening 1S strictly disallowed or can you open 1S if partner is not aware that above hand is possible for 1S (and 1S opening can be considered as a psyche)?

 

If Belgium we have rule of 18 (total of HCP + number of cards in 2 longest suits is at least 18). Above hand only has 17.

I asked similar questin to Belgian TD and the answer was: "On a clubevening I would put a stop on this. Assign score of 60/40 for violating rule of 18. These kind of bids go against the pleasure in the club".

...But this didn't really answer: Am I allowed to 'psyche' this or is it strictly forbidden to violate the rule of 18 or similar rule in the US?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally a use for that useless diamond king. Take teh diamond King away, and the hand is the same. The difference is, in the US, opening 1S on the hnad without the diamond king is "illegal" (with 6 hcp), but with the diamond king, you can open 1S (9 hcp). What a silly rule.

I think that actually, you're allowed to open that hand 1 in the US, but not to have the AGREEMENT to open that hand 1. If you see what I mean. This may or may not add tot he silliness. :lol:

I'm interested to know what would happen in US:

you have:

xxxxxx

AJxxxx

x

-

 

And you open 1S.

You don't have an agreement with your partner about this and normally you open with 12 HCP (can go till 10 with more distribution).

 

Question: Is opening 1S strictly disallowed or can you open 1S if partner is not aware that above hand is possible for 1S (and 1S opening can be considered as a psyche)?

 

If Belgium we have rule of 18 (total of HCP + number of cards in 2 longest suits is at least 18). Above hand only has 17.

I asked similar questin to Belgian TD and the answer was: "On a clubevening I would put a stop on this. Assign score of 60/40 for violating rule of 18. These kind of bids go against the pleasure in the club".

...But this didn't really answer: Am I allowed to 'psyche' this or is it strictly forbidden to violate the rule of 18 or similar rule in the US?

It is hard to say definitively, because I have gotten versions of rulings from directors that contradict each other. This seems to imply (and from my understanding of the american rules seems to be the case) that what would happen to you is this:

 

1. An opponent would call a director (if they were upset about this. If they don't call a director, nothing happens to you).

 

2. The director attempts to determine if you have an agreement to open that type of hand 1

a. If you are found to not have that agreement (note: this is DIFFERENT then whether you DO or DO NOT have that agreement*) then nothing happens, board stands.

b. If it is found that you have an agreement to open such hands, then depending on the competency (though it seems more like whim) of the director, one of the following may happen to you:

i. Director may attempt to determine what would have happened if you hadn't opened the hand 1 and assigned the score for that.

ii. Director may attempt to determine the most favorable thing (for the opponents) that could reasonably happen, and assign that score.

iii. The director could impose an artificial score (ave+, ave-)

iv. The director, in addition to one of the three above, may assign a procedural penalty to you.

 

I added the * because this really seems up to the director's mood, at least from my experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything could be right. For example, opening a weird 1H might get you a heart lead on defense. The main problems with opening this are that your partner may double them in five of a minor and that your partner will remember this hand the next time the opponents bid five of a minor. I pass but I wouldn't abuse a partner who chose to bid with this holding.

 

Regretably I agree with the somewhat cynical comments made about director rulings in cases like this. Both rule makers and directors seem to have difficulty distinguishing between "I wouldn't bid the hand this way" and "It's illegal (or must be made illegal) to bid the hand this way". Players should show enough respect for the game to not repeatedly bid whimsically and of course they cannot have secret agreements but if it appears at all reasonable to think they are using their judgment, however flawed that may be, then they should be left in peace to do so.

 

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, those of you who say you would open this with a weak opening bid showing majors, are you talking of some Ekren showing 4+/4+? I never got it how people can be happy to open this with 4-4, 5-4, 6-4 or 6-6...

 

I would either open this 2, then later bid 3 voluntarily, or pass and bid Michaels later.

 

Arend

I would open this an Ekren 2 in our system showing 4/4 or better and be happy about it.

 

If there is no competition, we have easy methods to find out about the extra shape.

 

If there is competition, the opening hand is allowed to double (if at a reasonable level) to show that they had freak shape (65 or better). It hasn't been a problem for us thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...