Jump to content

Violated my own principles


han

Recommended Posts

I am a firm believer that one should open 1NT with all balanced hands in the appropriate range. At the local club last Wednesday, I went against my own principles when I picked up:

 

AQ9xx

KQ10

xx

KQx

 

Our notrump range was 14-16. I figured that the whole room would be opening 1S and decided to do the same.

 

This was our unusual auction:

 

1S-(2D)-pass-(pass)

Dbl-(2H)-pass-(pass)

pass

 

Partner had x xx KQJx xxxxxx, and LHO, believe it or not, was 4-4 in the red suits. 2H-1 was a bad score, we would do quite well in clubs.

 

Was there a lesson to be learned from this? Is this just one of the things that can happen when playing against really weak opponents? Or was this actually partner's fault for not bidding 3C?

 

I know one thing, next time I'm opening 1NT again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This auction is pretty weird (overcall in 4-card suit and run to other 4-card suit) and I wouldn't really chalk it up to the 1 opening. In fact I think this hand is probably too good for a 14-16 1NT open. Opponents are probably more (not less) likely to bid four-card suits over 1NT (I know a lot of DONT players who somehow think this is good bridge). And partner really should bid 3; I don't see that this gets any easier for partner after 1NT-(2 DONT)...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 16 is great. Opening 1S and then showing 17-19 is right on values and gets your 5 card suit in.

 

Yes pop is slang for X.

i can live with 1s and planning on rebid of 2nt showing exactly 17 hcp <_<

either way we should get to 2d x or 3clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not at all surprised that you have done better opening 1NT with five hearts than with five spades. A 1NT opener can bury both sides' fits, which will often lose when your suit outranks theirs and gain when the opposite is true. Also, opening 1 on 2533 is asking for trouble!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, there is a moral to the story. You have sinned against your own god. You deserve capital punishment and an eternity of rubber bridge with godzilla as pard :lol:

Disagree

Han has immediately repented and recanted. Agree with one thing: you are dead as soon as you start going against your own belief system, even if no one else agrees with you. To thine own self.......?

 

As Stockard Channing sang in the movie "Grease": "there are a lot worse things that I could do".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't think of a better possible outcome from your experiment. You tested your beliefs in a place where you could afford it, and came out as an even firmer believer :lol:

 

It is already a routine for me to open 1NT with any 5332 and honors in at least three of the suits. I played for a while with a partner who opened strong NT with anything between 14 and 19 points, who also mocked me for being too rigid, yet she finds opening NT with a 5-card major unthinkable. Go figure.

 

Petko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 16 is great. Opening 1S and then showing 17-19 is right on values and gets your 5 card suit in.

 

Yes pop is slang for X.

Touch, hit, smack or pop = double.

 

Rewind, send it back, cap it = redouble.

 

I'm sure there are others. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 16 is great. Opening 1S and then showing 17-19 is right on values and gets your 5 card suit in.

 

Yes pop is slang for X.

Touch, hit, smack or pop = double.

 

Rewind, send it back, cap it = redouble.

 

I'm sure there are others. :lol:

Crack = double

 

Beaver (from backgammon) = redbl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, just the other day, I had

 

AKQxx

Qx

Qxx

Qxx

 

and I violated my own principles and opened 1NT.

We got a dreadful result.

Oh yes, and I was (genuinely) Grosvenored on the hand, so I was even crosser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=s&v=n&n=sj10haxxxdxxxckj10x&w=sxxxxhjxdak10xxcxx&e=sxxhkxxxxdjxcaxxx&s=sakqxxhqxdqxxcqxx]399|300|Scoring: MP

1NT x xx P

P 2 x P

2S P 2NT all pass[/hv]

 

1NT 15-17

the first double showed 5minor+4major. xx was strong.

North's double of 2D was "take-out" (usually a doubleton or xxx)

North's 2NT was slightly conservative as we could have had no diamond stop.

 

West did extremely well by leading a top diamond on which East played the Jack (I'd have led a low diamond at trick 1). West then switched to a spade. East ducked TWO rounds of clubs, so I could have cashed out for 8 tricks. But funnily enough I assumed that West had the CA after two rounds had held (or that diamonds were 6-1), so I played a third round and was back to 7 tricks.

 

It could have been worse: had West switched to a heart at trick 2 I'd have gone two off! Had west passed over 1NT I would have gone off in 3NT instead.

 

Had I opened 1S, North would have bid 1NT and played there on a heart lead, and I bet he would have made a plus score. The field was, I think, generally going positive in 1NT or 2S.

 

I'd probably open 1NT again on that hand as it still looks so suitable for NT. But maybe the moral of this thread is not to violate your own principles....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...