Jump to content

Responding to opener's splinter rebid


Recommended Posts

I’m afraid that the answer is: it depends

 

It may sound trite but: if the splinter was forcing to game, then 3S is forcing

 

If, otoh, the splitter was invitational or invitational + then 3S is an offer to play there

 

In either case, 4S over 3H denies any slam interest…with slam interest, responder cuebids

 

What he holds for 4S depends on whether 3H was game force

 

Fwiw I like 3H to be invitational or better, reserving 4H to show specifically a void. This isn’t mainstream, but it isn’t rare either.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea of a splinter being forcing to game is not always a good idea imo. Responder in response to a 1m opening bid will especially in the 2/1 system bid 1 or 1 with the minimum of values to try to improve the contract, though usually if they have bid 1M with less strength, the suit will be five cards such as /Kxxxx or QJxxx. Though a 9 card fit will be better than a 8 card one, obviously.

 

If the 1M response has been made on something like Axxx Qxx xxx xxx then you are going to need plenty of good cards from opener to fill the gaps and make 4M a viable contract, so again having a splinter as invitational seems preferable.

 

I think that you also have to closely define what hands (HCPs, distributional points and hand shapes) opener rebids a splinter with also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...