ali quarg Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 Not quite sure how I should have bid this one as I was playing Acol rather than 2/1, but needless to say we didn't make PAR[hv=pc=n&w=sk53hkt3daq5432cq&e=sq8haq72dk976cak8&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=p?]]266|200[/hv] Coming soon to a screen near you with the best solutions :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 Who deals ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 With East dealing: 1♦-2♦ (inverted not denying 4M, inv+)2N(15+ GF)3♦ (could have asked with an art 3♣ so no 4M)3♥-3♠ (both stops, from this point on with E holding ♠Q and W known not to have 4M he knows the spades are a control)4♣-4N (heart control, no second spade control, 4♥ would be kickback, extras or would bid 4♦)6N (actually knows from his hand that W must have at least 6 diamonds as has a club control missing the AK and no 4M) Is just possible partner has Axx, KJx, AQxxxx, x or Axx, Kx, AQxxxxx, x and you have 13 off the top With W dealing: 1♦-2♦ (as above)2N (15+ GF, it's worth this once partner supports ♦)-3♣(art ask, partner can still have 4 hearts)3♦ (diamonds only)-3♥(stop)3♠(stop)-4♣(cue)4♦(minimum for auction, but better than 5♦)-4♥(kickback)4N(1/4)-5♣(Q?)5♥(yes and ♥K)-6N Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ali quarg Posted November 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 2N (15+ GF, it's worth this once partner supports ♦)-3♣(art ask, partner can still have 4 hearts)Even with singleton Q♣? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 Even with singleton Q♣? AQxxxx is vast when you know partner has 4, it's not quite AQxx and 2 aces but it's more than a king better than AQxx in a 12 count, even discounting the ♣Q I would GF, what do you need ? Ax, QJxx, Kxxx, xxx is plenty for 5♦, either major suit ace plus Kxxx, and the club K or A will also do for 3N most of the time (almost all of it if you have the ♣Q). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullve Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 With East dealing: 1♦-2♦ (inverted not denying 4M, inv+)2N(15+ GF)3♦ (could have asked with an art 3♣ so no 4M)3♥-3♠ (both stops, from this point on with E holding ♠Q and W known not to have 4M he knows the spades are a control)4♣-4N (heart control, no second spade control, 4♥ would be kickback, extras or would bid 4♦)6N (actually knows from his hand that W must have at least 6 diamonds as has a club control missing the AK and no 4M)How does West know that East already knows that West has a spade control? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 How one should bid this one depends on one’s methods I don’t know acolyte so can’t offer any advice if one is constrained by having to use that method I do know 2/1 but that doesn’t help much since 3/1 is not a ‘system’: it is an underlying philosophy. For instance, using 2/1 doesn’t mean that one is always using inverted minors nor, if one is, that one has a standard set of later actions With one partner I’d open 1D and partner would bid 2D, limit or better Turn opener, in our methods, bids 2H as an artificial game force. Without going into detail, I’d expect a fairly smooth auction to 6N With another partner I’d open 2C and partner would bid 2S, showing either 5-8 or about 12 hcp, balanced with no major or any hand with primary diamonds Opener bids 2N, responder transfers to 3D and then bids 4H, keycard Once again I expect to reach 6N but on that auction there is a slight risk of playing 6D. Since I’m primarily an imp player, I would not love reaching 6D but I wouldn’t be too upset. At mps, I’m sure we’d bid 6N even if we felt some uncertainty about the stiff club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 How one should bid this one depends on one’s methods I don’t know acolyte so can’t offer any advice if one is constrained by having to use that method I do know 2/1 but that doesn’t help much since 3/1 is not a ‘system’: it is an underlying philosophy. For instance, using 2/1 doesn’t mean that one is always using inverted minors nor, if one is, that one has a standard set of later actions With one partner I’d open 1D and partner would bid 2D, limit or better Turn opener, in our methods, bids 2H as an artificial game force. Without going into detail, I’d expect a fairly smooth auction to 6N With another partner I’d open 2C and partner would bid 2S, showing either 5-8 or about 12 hcp, balanced with no major or any hand with primary diamonds Opener bids 2N, responder transfers to 3D and then bids 4H, keycard Once again I expect to reach 6N but on that auction there is a slight risk of playing 6D. Since I’m primarily an imp player, I would not love reaching 6D but I wouldn’t be too upset. At mps, I’m sure we’d bid 6N even if we felt some uncertainty about the stiff club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 I'm not au fait with what passes for Acol these days and probably not ready for 3/1 either :)The hand is far from ideal for Italian 2/1 without inverted diamonds, but it would probably go: _______ 1♦(4+)2♣(GF) - 2♥(4+)4♦(fix) - 4♥(ctl)4♠(ctl) - 5♣(ctl, odd KC)6♦(play) - ? East might pass that for safety at IMPs, but at MPs with substantial extras we were unable to show, a huge diamonds fit and safety in the other suits it seems reasonable to convert to 6NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mw64ahw Posted November 10, 2022 Report Share Posted November 10, 2022 Not sure about Acol, but playing 2/1 TW variation1♣ - 1♠ GI1NT Balanced 12-14/18-19 - 2NT ♦ transfer4♣ 18-19 SI control - 4♠ 1/3 KCs ♠ control 2+ ♦ honours. (4♦ would deny 2+/3)4NT ♥ control - 5NT K♥6NT I can count the tricks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBengtsson Posted November 11, 2022 Report Share Posted November 11, 2022 Not knowing Acol in its entirety, but I guess that 4M (if not using 5M Acol) get bid before 4m. So, I guess that East opens 1♥, West responds 2♦ and then East has to take the decision whether to do next? Can you reach 6NT without a whole box of gadgets and without seeing both hands? Possibly. I think it is probably easier to reach 6NT if East opens 1♦ here, and Acol players are playing inverted minors. If they are not, then again it could be more difficult imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted November 13, 2022 Report Share Posted November 13, 2022 How does West know that East already knows that West has a spade control? He doesn't but without one E would likely bid 4♦ here rather than the more committal 4N as he's unlikely to have enough extras in the context of a diamond slam, remember he's already stretched somewhat with his GF, QJx is not a great holding and is the only possible one that is not a control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.