pescetom Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 MP The hand This was a 30%, instead of 57% for +1. Any idea what was going on at trick 3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorvald Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 Looks resonable to me if playing a bit safe - wrong with singleton Ten, but right with a small singleton (3 times as likely), Also right with a singleton K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 I have a feeling GIBson doesn't take into account IMPs vs MPs, choosing between lines based on which makes the contract more often (Suitplay says ace is best at matchpoints, 9 is best at IMPs). If someone can think of a made up deal which would prove/disprove this, I can test that theory.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorvald Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 I have a feeling GIBson doesn't take into account IMPs vs MPs, choosing between lines based on which makes the contract more often (Suitplay says ace is best at matchpoints, 9 is best at IMPs). If someone can think of a made up deal which would prove/disprove this, I can test that theory.. I think you are right. On the other hand we have seen deals where GIB risk giving the contract based on extra undertricks, but perhaps it is different in declaring and defending Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 Actually, ignore that, just tested and it definitely has different MP / IMP strategy like I originally thought. Will keep digging.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 Actually, I'm not even sure there's even anything fundamentally wrong here. The two lines were close to begin with, and with GIB interpreting 2♠ as spades and a minor, is the 9 really worse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorvald Posted August 20, 2022 Report Share Posted August 20, 2022 Actually, I'm not even sure there's even anything fundamentally wrong here. The two lines were close to begin with, and with GIB interpreting 2♠ as spades and a minor, is the 9 really worse? Good point, as that changes the odds for single ♣ in east, and the the 9 is the correct card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted August 20, 2022 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2022 Looks resonable to me if playing a bit safe - wrong with singleton Ten, but right with a small singleton (3 times as likely), Also right with a singleton KIf E has a singleton, then isn't it K or T 50% after W plays the 2? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorvald Posted August 20, 2022 Report Share Posted August 20, 2022 If E has a singleton, then isn't it K or T 50% after W plays the 2? Nope, as the 2 is a small card odds aren't changed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted August 20, 2022 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2022 Nope, as the 2 is a small card odds aren't changedFair enough, so 40% then. Of the 23 pairs that made overtricks, all but two of the human declarers played the A on first clubs trick (several received the T as lead by a robot opponent).Curiously, the only time a robot declarer chose the A rather than 9 was when a human opponent had interfered 2◇ multi showing an undisclosed 6 card major (which the robot declarer presumably takes as diamonds). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.