AL78 Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 MPs, playing Acol weak NT with an inexperienced partner I picked up this hand: ♠Q♥2♦AKT82♣AKQT76 I opened 1♣, partner responded 1♥, I bid 2♦, partner did a panic pass because she didn't know what to do and hadn't appreciated a reverse is forcing. Partner held: ♠KJ73♥QJ94♦973♣95 I can understand partner's lack of enthusiasm with a minimal response and none of the HCP in my suits, and when I cashed the two top diamonds and led the spade queen, South ducked so I emerged with 11 tricks. 3NT is cold and was the popular contract. Assuming the absence of Lebensohl, would you say 2NT is a reasonable second bid opposite the reverse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted July 8, 2022 Report Share Posted July 8, 2022 No real experience in Acol, but 2♠ looks more reasonable than 2NT, excluding some agreement where the latter is appropriate (no experience of Lebensohl over reverse or Ingbermann, I wouldn't use 2NT Moderateur here). In any case all roads lead to 3NT. Not recognising forcing bids is a serious problem and sometimes an excuse for masterminding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.