Missed game

[pilun]

[hv=pc=n&w=sat83hada8652cj73&e=sq762hj98d7ckqt52&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=1d(4%2B!S%2C%2010-15)2h(weak)2s3hpp3sppp]266|200[/hv]

 

1♦ shows 4+♠, not 4♥, 10-15

 

3♠ made 10 tricks, losing a trump, ♣A and a club ruff.

+620 at the other table.

 

As East, I didn't feel like bidding 3♠ or 3♥ (which?) first time with soft values and ♥J-x-x.

When the raise came, the belated 3♠ was more attractive. Not match points, so this is invitational, not competitive. Yes?

 

Partner passed, though I think she would have bid game with spades and diamonds swapped.

[mw64ahw]

As West I'm bidding 4♠ with that playing strength assuming 2♠ shows enough to be at the 3-level with a fit. Also I'd X rather than bid 2♠

[Douglas43]

Not sure whether this was pairs or IMPs? I don't play your system, but play Acol which has 4cM. In the nearest equivalent auction 1!S (2!H) ?, I think I'd stretch to 3!S on the East hand, certainly at IMPs. Two reasons:

 

1. We have a bid available to show a sounder raise (2NT)

2. My partner doesn't like those "bid two then bid three" auctions, so I try not to raise his blood pressure...

[sfi]

As East, I didn't feel like bidding 3♠ or 3♥ (which?) first time with soft values and ♥J-x-x.

When the raise came, the belated 3♠ was more attractive. Not match points, so this is invitational, not competitive. Yes?

I don't think 3S can be invitational - you already made that decision a round earlier. I don't remember Scamp well enough, but if West has a game-try double then 3S is clearly just competitive. Even without it, trying to show a hand that doesn't fit into the range you initially showed is asking a lot from partner. Once you choose to go low with 2S there doesn't seem to be a sensible route to game.

[DavidKok]

Edit: I missed the fact that 1♦ showed spades, not diamonds. That'll teach me to read first, talk later.

 

What would 2NT have been over 2♥? If that shows a sound raise to 3♠ you'll have more room to explore opener's pattern or strength. Maybe opener could then have doubled their 3♥ to show a maximum with shortness (so that East can upgrade the ♥Jxx - almost no wasted values). If 2♠ is a wide-ranging nuisance bid I think you are just fixed by the system.

 

The standard auction 1♦ (natural) - (2♥) - X - (3♥); 3♠ (if this is invitationa, a game try double instead if it is not)-(P)-4♠ looks normal to me so I think you just have a system disadvantage here.

[etha]

I think west can dbl to invite game

[johnu]

Looks like your pair uses the minimalist bidding system where you only make the minimum bids instead of showing values. 2♠ is a huge underbid with 4 trumps, a singleton, and a good 5 card suit as a source of tricks. I would rather bid 4♠ than bid 2♠ Passing 2♠ is another huge underbid with 3 aces, a singleton in opponents suit, and a system maximum. Passing 3♠ is consistent with passing 2♠.

 

I can't blame anybody for missing game because you followed the system.

[pilun]

Looks like I underbid as East, vul at IMPs.

 

In my defence, it's worth noting that West would have an automatic 1♦ opening with

 

♠Axxx ♥Qxx ♦KQxx ♣xx,

 

when 2♠ is a trick too high. Admittedly, that's a particularly dreadful hand to find opposite.

 

Still not sure whether 3♥ or 3♠ is right. It would be good to have a mixed raise available, such as the suggested 2NT.

That would be ideal.

[AL78]

Looks like I underbid as East, vul at IMPs.

 

In my defence, it's worth noting that West would have an automatic 1♦ opening with

 

♠Axxx ♥Qxx ♦KQxx ♣xx,

 

when 2♠ is a trick too high. Admittedly, that's a particularly dreadful hand to find opposite.

 

Still not sure whether 3♥ or 3♠ is right. It would be good to have a mixed raise available, such as the suggested 2NT.

That would be ideal.

 

An automatic 1♦ on a flat, almost 8 loser 11 count? I think that might be one issue. If responder errs on the passive side in the bidding because they are afraid they'll find partner with a sub-minimum opener like that, the risk of missing games when opener holds full values is increased.

[sfi]

An automatic 1♦ on a flat, almost 8 loser 11 count? I think that might be one issue. If responder errs on the passive side in the bidding because they are afraid they'll find partner with a sub-minimum opener like that, the risk of missing games when opener holds full values is increased.

It's worth noting that the original poster is playing a strong club system with light openings. 1D shows 10-15 with 4+ spades and denies 4+ hearts. The hand you are objecting to is not even a minimum in their system.

[bluenikki]

It's worth noting that the original poster is playing a strong club system with light openings. 1D shows 10-15 with 4+ spades and denies 4+ hearts. The hand you are objecting to is not even a minimum in their system.

But that just means that opener must treat this hand as a super tippy-top hand.

 

No matter what counting highcard points says.

[smerriman]

But that just means that opener must treat this hand as a super tippy-top hand.

 

No matter what counting highcard points says.

Which is why opener would have bid game had East made any attempt at a game try.

[foobar]

[hv=pc=n&w=sat83hada8652cj73&e=sq762hj98d7ckqt52&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=1d(4%2B!S%2C%2010-15)2h(weak)2s3hpp3sppp]266|200[/hv]

 

1♦ shows 4+♠, not 4♥, 10-15

 

3♠ made 10 tricks, losing a trump, ♣A and a club ruff.

+620 at the other table.

 

As East, I didn't feel like bidding 3♠ or 3♥ (which?) first time with soft values and ♥J-x-x.

When the raise came, the belated 3♠ was more attractive. Not match points, so this is invitational, not competitive. Yes?

 

Partner passed, though I think she would have bid game with spades and diamonds swapped.

 

IMO, you are beating yourself up too much about this hand. In a standard system, it's easy to imagine a stop in 3♠ after 1♦ - (2♥) - X - (3♥) - X (or 3♠). East may choose to bid on, but opener might very easily hold Axxx A KQJxx xxx and bid the same way.

[dokoko]

It's one of those hands where both partners are happy to accept an invite but none has enough to invite (in the context of your system). If you interchange ♣Q and ♣J your West would have had an invite while standard might have missed the game.