Redstone69 Posted April 1, 2022 Report Share Posted April 1, 2022 In an aggregate event, Norvite Pairs #86452, 1st N/S were awarded 1.5 BBO masterpoints and 1st E/W were awarded 3.8 masterpoints. Why would/should it be different? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butchie T Posted April 2, 2022 Report Share Posted April 2, 2022 E/W pair must have had a higher score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasRush Posted April 2, 2022 Report Share Posted April 2, 2022 In an aggregate event, Norvite Pairs #86452, 1st N/S were awarded 1.5 BBO masterpoints and 1st E/W were awarded 3.8 masterpoints. Why would/should it be different?The pair with the higher masterpoints almost certainly had a higher score, and placed in the overalls. You see this fairly often. Also note that a pair can win 1st overall in the B strat and win more masterpoints than an A pair that has a higher score (because the A pair was lower in the overall rankings, and perhaps only had a section place, not an overall place). I agree this can be confusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
undoubling Posted April 2, 2022 Report Share Posted April 2, 2022 In an aggregate event, Norvite Pairs #86452, 1st N/S were awarded 1.5 BBO masterpoints and 1st E/W were awarded 3.8 masterpoints. Why would/should it be different?Depends on the number of SECTIONS involved in the game. Overall placement in a multi-section game is more valuable (BBO or other) points-wise than section places-----b/c the overalls are measured against ALL of the players, not just those in YOUR section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.