Rebid with 6-4 after 1 over 1

[kgr]

[hv=pc=n&s=sahak6432dq2ca432&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1hp1sp]133|200[/hv]

What do you bid? 3♥ or 2♣

2♣ is forcing in our system; And partner can only support to 3♣ with invite+, otherwise he will give (very) false preference to 2♥.

 

and with less:

[hv=pc=n&s=sxhak6432dj2ca432&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1hp1sp]133|200[/hv]

or more:

[hv=pc=n&s=sahak6432dq2caq32&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1hp1sp]133|200[/hv]

[bluenikki]

What do opener's continuations mean after

1♥ - 1♠

2♣ - 3♣

?

[helene_t]

I don't see any reason not to rebid clubs with all these hands, but I wonder .... if opener can rebid 2♣ with the 2nd as well as the 3rd hand, how does opener show strength in 3rd round? Presumably 2♣ is unlimited (why else would it be forcing), but what would a 3♣ rebid mean, then? Splinter? Or specifically 5-5?

[bluenikki]

and with less:

[hv=pc=n&s=sxhak6432dj2ca432&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1hp1sp]133|200[/hv]

 

If responder is forced to reply 2♥ with ♥ void, you better not rebid 2♣ with this!

 

Carl

[smerriman]

Really need some more info on how your 2♣ bid works. If it's forcing, why not play it as some form of Gazzilli - which of course changes all of the answers.

[Douglas43]

I'm very old-fashioned. 2♣, 2♣, and 3♣. Noting the lack of stuffing in the Heart suit, which militates against an immediate rebid of them.

 

However, if I was playing the stated system, I'd probably rebid in hearts wherever possible because it sounds like false preference on a void could fix me.

[mw64ahw]

Playing a standard approach 3♣, 2♥, 3♣, but 2♣ for the 2nd one if forcing.

[kgr]

What do opener's continuations mean after

1♥ - 1♠

2♣ - 3♣

?

All would be GF.

On 3-level searching for best contract (f.i. 3NT).

4♣ SI with ♣

4♦ splinter

[kgr]

I don't see any reason not to rebid clubs with all these hands, but I wonder .... if opener can rebid 2♣ with the 2nd as well as the 3rd hand, how does opener show strength in 3rd round? Presumably 2♣ is unlimited (why else would it be forcing), but what would a 3♣ rebid mean, then? Splinter? Or specifically 5-5?

3♣ would be mini-splinter: Fit ♠, single ♣, 12-14 or 18-19.

[kgr]

and with less:

[hv=pc=n&s=sxhak6432dj2ca432&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1hp1sp]133|200[/hv]

 

If responder is forced to reply 2♥ with ♥ void, you better not rebid 2♣ with this!

 

Carl

Either you bid 2♣ or 2♥ and would end in 2♥ in that case?

[kgr]

Really need some more info on how your 2♣ bid works. If it's forcing, why not play it as some form of Gazzilli - which of course changes all of the answers.

It is natural, but forcing because it is unlimited. (because 3♣ is splinter)

[kgr]

[hv=pc=n&s=sahak6432dq2ca432&n=sk9652hqda75ckq65&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1hp1sp3hp4c(control%20for%20H)p4hppp]266|200[/hv]

(I think the North hand was something like this)

I did rebid 3♥, because I thought that it was the best way to describe my hand (especially the points).

I release that it was a bad choice.

Partner did give a control for H with single ♥Q.

My hand was max and I could bid 4♦ (last train) or 4♠ (control), but feared that partner searched ♦ control.