Jump to content

Bid or pass?


Recommended Posts

(I am presuming that you are playing relatively standard methods)

 

I personally would pass.

I love the shape, however, your suits are absolutely dreadful.

 

You don't want to be encouraging a spade lead.

Weak suits make it much easier for the opponents to double (and, given the vulnerability -1 or -2 doubled could easily be absolute bottoms).

 

If someone put a gun to my head and forced me to bid, I'd bid 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My stiff heart argues the opps have a fit so I wii be on lead and that lessens the risk of bidding a bad suit, (i.e., getting partner off to a bad lead) The vulnerability argues against getting too frisky so I content myself with 1S - with a passing partner we will need a spade fit to compete and if partner can't raise I am content to let opps play it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My partners would expect more from me for an adverse vulnerability action. 2H gets us to the 3 level if partner lacks spades and good opps won’t hesitate to wield the axe….plus they might not need to double if we are down 2 opposite no biddable and make able game.

 

Plus we’re painting a roadmap if they have an 8 or 9 card heart fit….declarer will play me for shortness if I bid 2H.

 

If I were forced to bid, it would be 1S but I’m not at all sure I want partner leading a spade v notrump….fine if he has the Queen,likely not fine if he has Ax(x) or Kx, etc.

 

Partners a passed hand, were red v white, both of which tell us that passing rates to be the percentage action.

 

I recognize that these days passing is considered cowardly.

 

Bidding could work….I just think it’s poor on the actual hand and even worse in the long run. We are sometimes going to hold a solid 2H or 2S overcall, and we want partner to trust us. I’d bid 2H happily if white v red, but partner knows what to expect then

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

matchpoints it is only one board so I am going to be coward and say 'pass' or '1' could work.. I would need better suits to use michaels cue bid here at this vulnerability, and a king extra (minimum).

 

if ops reach contract, you know that suit will break badly. why give them information in the auction as mikeh said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sjt982h5da8ck8643&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=p1h]133|200| Pilowski 'Matchpoints. What should South do?

+++++++++++++++++++

I rank

1. Pass. The hand lacks power, lead value, and suit quality

2. 2. Suggest a lead that you can stand.

3. 1. Not particularly keen on a lead.

4. 2. IMO, however, Michaels should suggest that partner compete at the 3-level or higher, with primary support for an advertised suit. At the prevailing vulnerability, opposite a passed hand, there's too much danger of a penalty. Even -200 could be a bottom. :( [/hv]

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I thought that West was cue-raising my spade/minor bid to show a good hand with heart support.

My partner (so I thought at the time) didn't like my spades and wanted to know about my minor.

[hv=pc=n&s=sjt982h5da8ck8643&n=s63hkj62dj7543ca5&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=p1h2h2s2np3c]266|200|

So of course, I bid my clubs.

[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 was aggressive but not terrible. 2NT is a disaster waiting to happen. 3 is a very good bid - with 5-5 hands we don't go fishing for notrump contracts, especially not 2NT. North has already blown it with the previous bid, but maybe they are wise enough to pass now. It's not going to get better by bidding on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...