mw64ahw Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 [hv=pc=n&s=skthqj3daj98753c6&n=saq643hat65d2cj74&d=e&v=0&b=14&a=p1d]266|200|Optimal suit, wrong level, wrong play[/hv]Where do you end up? - we found the correct suit, underbid and went down As an addition 3 pairs contracted in unmakeable games (1xEW in ♣) 2 making - no-one contracted in a makeable game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 I can imagine this auction for me as:1D-1S2D-2H3D-POr1D-1S2D-2H2S-3SP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullve Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 1♦(1)-1♥(2)1N(3)-2♣(4)2♦(5)-P (1) "10+, NATish unBAL" OR "20-22 BAL"(2) "0+, (3)4+ S, may have longer H unless GF values"(3) 9-14, 2-S5D5C OR "10-12", 2-S3-H6+D OR "16-18, any (unBAL)" OR "20-22 BAL"(4) "8+, relay"(5) "10-12", 2-S3-H6+D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 Because we play 1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥ as an artificial ask, we would bid 1♦-1♠-2♦-2N(5 spades/4hearts inv)-3♦ I suspect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 1♦-2 (5S/4H inv+)-3♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 Much like Winstonm but probably passing 2S:1D-1S2D-2H2S-p/3S If diamonds is better so be it, spades is where the system leads.If BBO were to restore the simulation facility we could know with some objectivity. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 [hv=pc=n&d=S&w=skthqj3daj98753c6&e=saq643hat65d2cj74&d=e&v=0&b=14&a=P1DP1SP2DP2HP2SP2NP3DPPP]266|200|mw64ahw 'Optimal suit, wrong level, wrong playWhere do you end up? - we found the correct suit, underbid and went down. ttAs an addition 3 pairs contracted in unmakeable games (1xEW in ♣) 2 making - no-one contracted in a makeable game.+++++++++++++++++++++Deal rotated to make South dealer.IMO responder has a close decision whether or not to pass 2♠.Game seems a poor prospect [/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted July 27, 2021 Report Share Posted July 27, 2021 Depending on system: 1♦-1♠;2♦ (usually "overstrength preempt")-2♥2♠ (or 3♦, but at MPs, I like 2♠)-p. I can see a game try, which gets Nigel's auction. or: 2♦-2♠;p. If partner wants to run from diamonds (which, granted, could be J8532 or worse), Kx and the ♦A should be enough to survive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mw64ahw Posted July 28, 2021 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2021 I'm not sure why, but the NS hands felt like they had game potential when playing, but we got stuck in 2♠ Game probabilities are approximately 5♦ 9% 4 makeable 4♥ 35% 4 makeable 4♠ 19% 6 makeableStrangely of the 4 pairs that bid ♠ only one pair managed to make 3 with the others going down. Is this such a hard one to play? 1 pair made 3NT after West failed to overcall and a ♥ was led. The other pair in 3NT went down 2 after a 2♣ overcall1 pair made 5♦ after a K♣ lead followed by the A♣The sole EW contract went down heavily in 5♣ The other point I felt was an oddity was the general reluctance of the Wests to overcall 2♣ [hv=pc=n&s=skthqj3daj98753c6&w=s982hkdt64cakt952&n=saq643hat65d2cj74&e=sj75h98742dkqcq83&d=e&v=e&b=6&a=1d]399|300[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 28, 2021 Report Share Posted July 28, 2021 Odd indeed since 2C over 1D is one overcall I have always routinely stretched to make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts