pilowsky Posted July 17, 2021 Report Share Posted July 17, 2021 I wondered yesterday if it was possible to be dealt a hand so bland that nobody could make any contract.So I created that most boring hand I could think of, and it still makes 1 of something (except NT).Here it is:[hv=lin=st%7C%7Cpn%7Cpilowsky,~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot%7Cmd%7C3SAT62HJ73DQ84CK95,SK95HAT62DJ73CQ84,SQ84HK95DAT62CJ73,SJ73HQ84DK95CAT62%7Csv%7Co%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%201%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7Cp%7C]300|300|Here's the double-dummy result: http://bit.ly/BlandHand[/hv] So my question is: Is it possible to be dealt a hand that makes no contracts at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted July 17, 2021 Report Share Posted July 17, 2021 Yes; the simplest example is: AKQJ x xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x AKQJ AKQJ x x AKQJ xxxx xxxx where not only do all contracts go down, they actually go down 2. {edited to fix accidentally rotated hands} Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilowsky Posted July 17, 2021 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2021 [hv=lin=st%7C%7Cpn%7Cpilowsky,~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot%7Cmd%7C3ST987HT987DAKQJC2,S2HAKQJD6543C6543,SAKQJH2DT987CT987,S6543H6543D2CAKQJ%7Csv%7Co%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%201%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7Cp%7C]300|300| This example makes 2X for whoever has the AKQJ.I think it's because your example gives 2 8-card fits to each pair, whereas the original hand only has 7-card fits.[/hv] [hv=lin=st%7C%7Cpn%7Cpilowsky,~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot%7Cmd%7C3S2HAKQJDT987C6543,ST987H6543DAKQJC2,SAKQJH2D6543CT987,S6543HT987D2CAKQJ%7Csv%7Co%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%201%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7Cp%7C]300|300|I think you meant this hand.[/hv] 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted July 17, 2021 Report Share Posted July 17, 2021 Oops, yes, messed up the formatting when entering the hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted July 17, 2021 Report Share Posted July 17, 2021 Thomas Andrews has investigated this in (fascinating) detail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.