Jump to content

BPO-003B


Recommended Posts

The poll is now closed, and the threads will be open for discussion.

 

[hv=d=n&v=n&s=skq9832hak4dac762]133|100|Scoring: IMP

BPO-003B

South West North East

 1    Pass  1NT    2

   ?

 

Your Bid as south. Submitted by Rebound

[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPO-003B: 2S

 

East just made a vulnerable 2C overcall in a non-fit auction. While its true that the vulnerability favors E-W, East should still have decent values for this action. Holding AKxxxx and out East would bid 3C which actually uses up some bidding spaces. The combination of East's strength and our own clearly suggests that partner holds a weak hand with long Diamonds. Throw in the fact that we hold xxx in Cubs (the worst possible holding) and I'm not feeling enthusiastic about game. I'm going to bid a simple 2S. Please note that the free bid does not show extra strength and can be passed. It merely shows some shape. I'll pass a 3D advance and force game if partner shows strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for 3

 

I know it's borderline (not a great suit) but this is IMP's and with the interference, I think all partner's points will be useful and I want to give him the best description as I can.

 

Imo, 2 shows 6 and no extra even if it's a free bid

 

Alain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the 3 small 's. But still 3 : partner does not need a lot to make 4. I don't want to miss this vuln game.

If partner has:

Ax

Qxxx

xxxx

xxx

Then 4 has good changes and even after we bid 3 we will not reach it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The poll is now closed, and the threads will be open for discussion.

 

[hv=d=n&v=n&s=skq9832hak4dac762]133|100|Scoring: IMP

BPO-003B

South West North East

 1    Pass  1NT    2

   ?

 

Your Bid as south. Submitted by Rebound

[/hv]

2Sp is too weak, 3Sp would be a somewhat pointless invitation. This is IMPs so why not cross fingers, knock on wood, and bid 4Sp.

 

Petko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 1/2 spades is my bid!

 

I voted for Double (of course)

not penalty as was determined in a previous BPO hand, but card-showing, then rebidding spades. club holding is not very good, whatever clubs P has are being led through. I need some spade support over there: basically need 2 tricks and to be able to avoid a spade loser, or 3 tricks from P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
LOL. when i commented on this hand i thought i had 7 spades...wow...i said i was underbidding with 3S because of the club holding with a normal 4S bid...OK wow. Well I'd still bid 3S but my comments arent applicable :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. when i commented on this hand i thought i had 7 spades...wow...i said i was underbidding with 3S because of the club holding with a normal 4S bid...OK wow. Well I'd still bid 3S but my comments arent applicable :P

On the pipe down in the heart of Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 1/2 spades is my bid!

 

I voted for Double (of course)

not penalty as was determined in a previous BPO hand, but card-showing, then rebidding spades. club holding is not very good, whatever clubs P has is being led through. I need some spade support over there: basically need 2 tricks and to be able to avoid a spade loser, or 3 tricks from P

Double normally shows shortness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
LOL. when i commented on this hand i thought i had 7 spades...wow...i said i was underbidding with 3S because of the club holding with a normal 4S bid...OK wow. Well I'd still bid 3S but my comments arent applicable :rolleyes:

On the pipe down in the heart of Texas.

hahaha yes, everyone will think im very agressive now when they see my reply LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 1/2 spades is my bid!

 

I voted for Double (of course)

not penalty as was determined in a previous BPO hand, but card-showing, then rebidding spades.  club holding is not very good, whatever clubs P has is being led through.  I need some spade support over there: basically need 2 tricks and to be able to avoid a spade loser, or 3 tricks from P

Double normally shows shortness.

normally would agree

 

in this case i would like a little more solidity in spade suit to rebid 3S over 2C. My suggested sequence seems to me to be a reasonable compromise.

 

I am certainly not firmly committed to this bid, and upon reflection, realize that other suggested bids are certain reasonable. But the reasoning behind the bid makes sense to me. (Now, that's scary.)

Doubling first might just be the results of years of conditioning to make card-showing doubles. I keep telling people, I am a bidding dinosaur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Testing the waters (again):

 

From contestants' votes:

 

3 14

2 8

dbl 5

3 3

4 1

 

I am setting up a poll about what information people want.

 

poll on what you'd like to see displayed: http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?showtopic=8617

 

Poll on timing of answers: http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?act=ST&f=9&t=8618

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...