jillybean Posted July 1, 2021 Report Share Posted July 1, 2021 There were a couple of boards I was happy with from last night, I'm checking that I do indeed have a reason to be pleased. [hv=pc=n&s=sakq5h93daq9743c3&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1dp1hp1sp1np?]133|200[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted July 1, 2021 Report Share Posted July 1, 2021 There were a couple of boards I was happy with from last night, I'm checking that I do indeed have a reason to be pleased. [hv=pc=n&s=sakq5h93daq9743c3&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1dp1hp1sp1np?]133|200[/hv]I’d bid 3D. That shows 4 spades, 6+ diamonds and a good hand, but the diamonds are not AKQxxx. With AJxx x AKQxxx xx, a weaker hand, I’d bid 3N at imps. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBengtsson Posted July 1, 2021 Report Share Posted July 1, 2021 I’d bid 3D. That shows 4 spades, 6+ diamonds and a good hand, but the diamonds are not AKQxxx. With AJxx x AKQxxx xx, a weaker hand, I’d bid 3N at imps. agree. partner will know what sort of hand you have here. strong but not quite reverse with 6-4 shape. his 1Nt could be somewhere between 5-10 points. on personal level I do not think 3♦ should be forcing here: having some checkback by way of 2♣/2♦ after 1NT solves problem of other hands here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted July 1, 2021 Report Share Posted July 1, 2021 I’m with Mike: 3D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts