bidding problem

[JAQPM]

Openers hand KJ96 Pards hand A873

Q3 AK98

J6 9

KJt32 9654

 

Bidding 1C..P..1H..2D

 

Question Opener cannot X as it is support so Passed as 2S could be a reverse

Pard was reluctant to bid 2S as it could intimate five H

 

Who should bid S

replies would be appreciated

[JAQPM]

hands looked horrible jumbled so

opener kj96....q3...j6...kjt32

Responder A873..Ak98..9..9654

Hope this is understandable

[sfi]

The hand editor tool is your friend :) . In general you also want to specify vulnerability and form of scoring.

 

[hv=pc=n&w=skj96hq3dj6ckjt32&e=sa873hak98d9c9654&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=1cp1h2d]266|200[/hv]

 

Opener's pass is normal. Responder has an easy takeout double, after which opener can bid 2S.

[Winstonm]

1c-p-1H-2d

P-P-x-P

2s

[JAQPM]

Thank you both for your prompt reply

We play that if three suits have been bid then X is penalty

Is this wrong?

[sfi]

"Wrong" is a strong word (I might still use it in this instance), but your agreement differs from common practice. As you found out here, you need ways to say "I want to compete but I'm not sure how" much more than you need ways to penalise the opponents with a trump stack. Otherwise, some hands are simply impossible to bid accurately. For reference, in serious competitions I think I have seen one pair in the past decade who play this sort of thing as penalty, and they prealert that a lot of their low-level doubles are penalty.

 

More generally, you want to play most doubles of suit bids below game as "takeout" rather than "penalty", although there are many shades of grey and many specific agreements that impact them. In fact, you are better off if your agreement start with "doubles are takeout unless ..."

 

So what are these 'unless' rules? It depends how fancy you want to get, but they typically include:

• We've passed a takeout double for penalty
  
• Partner has preempted
  
• We've found a fit (you might have an exception for game-try doubles)
  
• The hand has taken action to show values (such as double of their opening NT, 1x (X) XX, or 1M (2NT) X)
  

Even over the last one I still prefer takeout doubles. That's less common though.

 

This list will be easier to remember and much shorter than starting with the idea that double is penalty and writing down the exceptions. You lose the direct penalty double but you gain the ability to cooperatively compete in a wide range of auctions. You can still penalise them most of the time, but by passing a takeout double rather than by direct action.

 

The other thing you gain is that you don't have to worry about specific types of doubles - negative, responsive, snapdragon, etc. Even support doubles mostly fall into this general approach. They're all basically "takeout".

[Winstonm]

Yes. Modern bridge has fewer penalty doubles than older styles as takeout has been shown to be more valuable.

[TylerE]

Yes. Modern bridge has fewer penalty doubles than older styles as takeout has been shown to be more valuable.

 

The pendulum is perhaps swinging back the other way a bit given the utter cheese that people are bidding on these days...

[jillybean]

Thank you both for your prompt reply

We play that if three suits have been bid then X is penalty

Is this wrong?

This is how I was taught too. Unfortunately, or fortunately, bridge is a lot more complex than this and those teaching new students should add the caveat that these "rules" are only guidelines to get you started.

Double here is take out. Partner can always convert the double to penalty with an appropriate hand,but it is not likely at the 1 level.

[paulg]

Thank you both for your prompt reply

We play that if three suits have been bid then X is penalty

But you are not really playing this in these sequences, as opener's double is support which is really a takeout double than penalty.

 

So hopefully it is not difficult to see that responder's double should be takeout too as opener can not make a penalty double.

[pescetom]

So hopefully it is not difficult to see that responder's double should be takeout too as opener can not make a penalty double.

It would be easier if you spelled it out :)

Is your logic just that it makes even more sense to play responder's double as takeout because opener might well be able to convert it to punishment, or something more elusive?

[paulg]

But you are not really playing this in these sequences, as opener's double is support which is really a takeout double than penalty.

 

So hopefully it is not difficult to see that responder's double should be takeout too as opener can not make a penalty double.

It would be easier if you spelled it out :)

Is your logic just that it makes even more sense to play responder's double as takeout because opener might well be able to convert it to punishment, or something more elusive?

There is a greater probability that the opener has a penalty double when they do not have heart support, so the ability to convert a takeout double into a penalty double is higher.

 

When the responder has a penalty double of diamonds, which will be rare sitting under the bidder, there is a far higher chance that partner either has heart support or will have bid with a black two-suited hand.

 

So, overall, it is far more probable that responder will want to compete rather than penalise.

[Winstonm]

It would be easier if you spelled it out :)

Is your logic just that it makes even more sense to play responder's double as takeout because opener might well be able to convert it to punishment, or something more elusive?

Back when I learned - prior to sunshine and dirt - these doubles were called “cooperative doubles “, meaning, I have too much to pass but no clear bid. That description still makes sense to me.