Jump to content

How good is your bidding?


the hog

Recommended Posts

You are Nth. vul vs not Sth opens

 

Jxxx

Ax

QTxx

K98

 

1D (1H) 1S (2H)

4C (P) ?

 

You are playing a canape system - the Caroline Club, if you want to know. opener has shown 5/6 very good C, 4D and a max hand - 14-15. Your bid is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

5D, unless you have a way to agree diamonds as

trumps below 5D.

 

I would like to make some positive noise, but I am

not willing to drive to slam. I probably have the

"golden" cards, partner needs, but ...

 

I assume

- 4C is passable

- 4D is preference

- 4H / 4S are cue bids, agreeing clubs ???

- 4 NT, RKCB for clubs ?`

- 5C / 5D, to play

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the system, but it seems very strange to me that partner can bid this way with only 4-5 in the minors, 5-6 seems far more likely.

 

This is a great hand, and chances for slam are excellent. I'll start with 4H (not necessarilly setting clubs as trump as we have no way to show diamond support). Over 4S I'll bid 6D. Over 5C I'll sign off in 5D. If partner takes control immediately, great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Partner seems to be short in s. So slam isn't pretty far away probably. I just wonder if 4 would set trumps or if it's a signoff bid. Otherwise I'll use some kind of cuebid (4).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If partner has 6, singleton , and no honnor in the majors 6 seems the right spot. But that is probably just a dream, 4 can drive us too high quickly, so I would just bid a game, I am not sure of wich minor but I'll try 5.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GOOD problem

 

The big question is, of course, whether partner has a "miracle" hand...

 

A

x

AJxx

AQxxxxx

 

or some such...

 

With this said and done, I am having a lot of trouble constructing hands for partner that have play for slam but don't require a Diamond hook. The bulk of the opponent's HCP are sitting over partner so I'm worried that any hook is going to be off. From my perspective, slam hinges on whether partner is 6-4 or 7-4 in the minors and I don't see a good way to explore this.

 

Barry Crane once said (approximately) "Don't play me to have the perfect hand. I won't". I'm going to heed his advice and bid a "quiet" 5.

 

If I were to try for slam, 4 seems clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 4 - 4 I bid 4NT 6 aces keycard. I think it will be quite clear that the 6 minor suit keycards are important.

If I get a 4KC response I can ask with 5 about a minor suit queen and go to 7 when pd can show the club queen. If we don't have the 6 keycards then I can signoff in 6.

 

Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 4 - 4 I bid 4NT 6 aces keycard. I think it will be quite clear that the 6 minor suit keycards are important.

If I get a 4KC response I can ask with 5 about a minor suit queen and go to 7 when pd can show the club queen. If we don't have the 6 keycards then I can signoff in 6.

 

Luis

I have nothing more to add...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall

sorry luis but pard cannot have A AK AQ (17 points).

 

I am curious what would 4N mean in the system actually being used? That will affect my decision. If no agreement I would just bid 6D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An easy "magic hand" for partner:

 

x

xx

AKxx

AQxxxx

 

I agree with the 4 call. It seems like with a hand like the above though, partner pretty much knows we have slam after the 4 bid. He has many keycards in the minors and spades locked up. My concern is getting to slam opposite a hand like:

 

x

Kx

KJxx

AQJxxx

 

I'm not sure how Luis' 6-ace keycard works, but if the "two" response is past 5 (as it is in pretty much every form of 4NT keycard I'm aware of) then we have a problem.

 

I think I'd just bid 5 over 4 and let partner decide the next step. I've announced slam interest opposite his shape and range and shown my heart control; I will trust partner's judgement.

 

BTW, what would a 3 free bid by partner show? It seems like partner's 4 really should be 4-6 at least, I'm having trouble imagining a 4-5 hand with 14-15 hcp that wants to leap to the four level opposite a simple 1/1 response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I apply my rule of thumb: is there a minimum pard might have for this bidding that makes slam laydown? x, xx, AKJx, AQxxxx. Seems so. I will bid 4H (my one try at slam). Regardless of what pard bids next (exluding blackwood), my next bid is 5D - I've had my say and now it is up to him or her to go on.

 

WinstonM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if partner bids 4S you really must bid 6D Winstonm

 

Perhaps different styles, but I must humbly disagree. It is pard who knows he holds:

 

x,

Qx

AKxx

AQxxxx

 

instead of

 

x,

Kxx,

AKJx

A10xxxx

 

After making a try, showing the heart Ace, what else could north have to then sign off except the minor suit cards? With the second hand, if north held xxxx, Ax, Qxxx, KQx he would not sign off - the sign off then must be a missing minor suit card to my way of thinking. Close decision, but then isn't that what separates the good from bad result?

 

WinstonM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are playing a canape system - the Caroline Club, if you want to know. opener has shown 5/6 very good C, 4D and a max hand - 14-15. Your bid is?

Was playing in main bridge club late a few nights ago. A new P tapped in as my partner with the SN of djb. He had a profile with canape, strong club. 10-12 NT etc. To make a long story short, it was Doug Bone, one of the authors of the Caroline Club system, and he was somewhat surprised that I recognized the profile (actually wasn't sure if it was Caroline club or a slightly different system.)

 

Now, if I hadn't shown my true colors (aka: inept declarer play) and blew a cold strip and endplay....................................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if partner bids 4S you really must bid 6D Winstonm

 

Perhaps different styles, but I must humbly disagree. It is pard who knows he holds:

 

x,

Qx

AKxx

AQxxxx

 

instead of

 

x,

Kxx,

AKJx

A10xxxx

 

After making a try, showing the heart Ace, what else could north have to then sign off except the minor suit cards? With the second hand, if north held xxxx, Ax, Qxxx, KQx he would not sign off - the sign off then must be a missing minor suit card to my way of thinking. Close decision, but then isn't that what separates the good from bad result?

 

WinstonM

I don't think your example hand, (I assume Kx of H), would qualify for the 3C bid Winston. The club suit is supposed to be of really good quality for the bid. I'm not sure if AT to 6 would qualify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...