Gerben42 Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Pass = I don't want to play with you anymore. It's like this auction: North: 1♥South: 1♠North: 2♥South: 2♠North: 3♥South: DoubleWest: You can't double your partner!South: He's no longer my partner! Not to be confused with an auction like this: North: 1♠South: 2NT JacobyNorth: 3♣ SingletonSouth: 4♣ ConfusingNorth: Pass Here Pass = I enjoy pain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickyB Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 If you treat his 2♣ openings as only semi-forcing, he will start opening 4♠ or 3NT whenever he has a real 2♣ opening. And rightly so. Then you will pass his 2♣ openings with more and more values, and raise his 4♠ openings to six with a flat hand with an ace and a king. Ok, having thought a little more I agree that passing 2C is wrong on this hand. However, I still think that 32 32 432 765432 is likely to gain IMPs by passing. There are pards who I wouldn't do it with - same as there are pards that don't like psyches, or the risking of a game for an overtrick even when it is mathematically right to do so. I disagree totally with Helene's statement - opening 3N or 4♠ on an absolute GF would not be justifiable just because there is a 0.1% chance of partner deciding to pass 2♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulg Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Bridge is a partnership game - passing a strong 2♣ opener is an individual decision by the significantly weaker hand and is masterminding (that is, making the decision because you do not trust partner) of the worst sort in my opinion. If your partner does continue to play with you, then you should discuss which hands you will open 2♣ and which you will open at the 1-level. Experts tend to be happier [than beginner/intermediates] to open strong hands at the 1-level and keep the 2♣ bid really for game-forcing hands. There is a very small fraction of hands where you can contemplate passing a forcing bid. However these all have more information available than one bid from partner AND you believe that partner will understand your decision. Clearly neither of these conditions are true here. p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Wow, Helene, the dog idea did not occur to me yet. But 2 puppies arriving july2nd... what possibilities. Furthermore partner hates dogs. Pity partner lives 30 km away. Guggie, with 2 puppies you will have no time for bridge! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guggie Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 that s what my husband hopes;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 It would never occur to me to pass 2♣ in Standard or 2/1, or anywhere else that this is a strong forcing opening showing nothing about partner's shape. I must admit that I have passed partner's forcing bid before. Playing Standard American, the bidding went: 1♣-(1♠)-pass-(pass);2♠-all pass And I held 9xxxxxx/xxx/xxx/--. Of course, partner WAS limited, I didn't have a four card major, nor a real spade stopper. On the opening lead, partner said "you better have seven or eight small spades and nothing else", and I just grinned at him and arranged dummy (this was in a live game). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 K it's time for confessional. I've passed a Precision 1C once, on sheer accident, because my mind was on the last hand where I chunked an overtrick and contract. Not good karma. That and I was not happy with the course of my game; I had stunk up the joint. And I probably was craving either DQ or Skittles or pizza. We ended up with a cold top, I hit pard's hand. I still don't know why I did that but it happened. Pard was "mildly suprised" but thrilled with the +130. The opps took some sympathy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 I opened a strong club once and passed 1D with 2272 15 count :) Pard had 7 hearts lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double ! Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I opened a strong club once and passed 1D with 2272 15 count ;) Pard had 7 hearts lol Curious.How many spades could the opps make? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I opened a strong club once and passed 1D with 2272 15 count Pard had 7 hearts lol Are we to assume that partnership is still healthy and viable? LoLoL. WinstonM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 North has bal 22 hcp so has a normal 2C opener, unless my arithmetic is off. Eh! Last time I looked a 2NT opening shows 20-22 in most standard systems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 North has bal 22 hcp so has a normal 2C opener, unless my arithmetic is off. Eh! Last time I looked a 2NT opening shows 20-22 in most standard systems. Funny how a point makes a difference. Most modern bridge teachers teach 2NT shows 20-21. Anyway, what would help is playing some bid that right away shows a double negative. My partner and I play that this sequence is passable: 2♣-2♥;2NT But not if the 2♥ bid were anything else (ie 2♦, while still "waiting" sets up a gameforce, allowing the 2♣ bidder to rebid 2NT with a really strong hand, too) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 "Funny how a point makes a difference. Most modern bridge teachers teach 2NT shows 20-21." Really? I love generalisations like this. I would be very interested in seeing the results of your survey of "most modern bridge teachers." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 elianna is correct about most modern US bridge teachers, perhaps wrong in other parts of the world (i have no idea). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I opened a strong club once and passed 1D with 2272 15 count ;) Pard had 7 hearts lol Curious.How many spades could the opps make? We could make 4H and they could make 2S. Pard only had 6 points but they were the right ones :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 "Funny how a point makes a difference. Most modern bridge teachers teach 2NT shows 20-21." Really? I love generalisations like this. I would be very interested in seeing the results of your survey of "most modern bridge teachers." Funny how you seem to protest about generalizations such as that, and yet you said 2NT shows 20-22 in most standard systems? Is that not a generalization? Mine at least is likely to be accurate. While I have not taken a survey of modern bridge teachers, I have seen teaching material put out by the ACBL, which states that opening 2NT has a range of 20-21. Granted, the ACBL is not the be all and end all of modern bridge, nor of what's "standard" and I probably made a mistake when I said most modern teachers, I should have said american teachers. If you wish to investigate, go to the acbl webpage, download their manual for teachers, and look at page 15 (section 1, deal 6) Where do you get the info for YOUR claims? Or are YOUR generalizations exempt from needing to be backed up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Eh! Last time I looked a 2NT opening shows 20-22 in most standard systems. Now that you've got my attention, look at even the yellow card, which many people on bbo tend to treat as "Standard American", and at bbo standard and bbo advanced. A link to an image of the yellow card (ie SAYC) is: http://www.bridgeprotour.com/ (click on yellow card on the bottom of the page). I'll await your sources with anticipation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Quibbling over a measley 1 high card point seems a little senseless, when we all know that whatever the range it's the quality of the hand rather than exact point count that makes it worth 2C-2N. Also, I am fully aware of what being a jack short of my bid makes me... ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Quibbling over a measley 1 high card point seems a little senseless, when we all know that whatever the range it's the quality of the hand rather than exact point count that makes it worth 2C-2N. Also, I am fully aware of what being a jack short of my bid makes me... ;) With all due respect here, Wiston, The Hog and I are NOT quibbling over 1 point right now. I agree that it's irrelevant to bridge, but it's completely relevant to how quite a few people on the forums treat others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I agree that it's irrelevant to bridge, but it's completely relevant to how quite a few people on the forums treat others. On that note...you suck! ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 On that note...you suck! And, of course, this reminds me of another bridge story. :) Years ago the director was summoned to the table and a "player who will remain nameless" stated that his opponents had called him a "lousy &*!@#$##$!" His complaint it turns out was not over the derogatory term; rather he complained vehemently about being called, "Lousy". ;) ROFLMAO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Quibbling over a measley 1 high card point seems a little senseless, when we all know that whatever the range it's the quality of the hand rather than exact point count that makes it worth 2C-2N. Also, I am fully aware of what being a jack short of my bid makes me... ;) With all due respect here, Wiston, The Hog and I are NOT quibbling over 1 point right now. I agree that it's irrelevant to bridge, but it's completely relevant to how quite a few people on the forums treat others. Not at all; I just get amused when people make blanket statements and expect others to accept them as gospel truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Eh! Last time I looked a 2NT opening shows 20-22 in most standard systems. Not at all; I just get amused when people make blanket statements and expect others to accept them as gospel truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Ho hum Justin, look at the online system cards on the ecats site of those who play a strong 2NT opening. While you are at it, look up the same information on Daniel's system site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 the point about who is right or wrong is irrelevant the point is that you say you get amused with people who make blanket statements when you use them yourself. I get amused by hypocrisy. Anyways this is going to turn into a pissing contest so I'm done with this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts