jillybean Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 [hv=pc=n&s=sa63hajdkq652cq42&w=st972h9542dt43c75&n=skhkqtda987cakj63&e=sqj854h8763djct98&d=e&v=b&b=10&a=p1n(15-18)p4c(cro)p4n(2A%2C%20same%20rank)p5c(King%20ask)p5d(1%2F4)p7nppp]399|300[/hv]We were one of four pairs, out of 18, who bid it. It's hard to argue with results but I don't know how we could bid it intelligently. Playing 12-14 nt , I open 1♦ 1♦ 2♣ (clubs, gf)3♣ 3♦3♥ 4♦*5♣ 2+Q .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles123 Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 1N - 3S (Splinter) 4D - 4N (Keycard) 5D (3) - 5H (Q?) 5N Q+no KS or KC - 6C (Qc?) 7D (yes) - 7N (Can count 13) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mw64ahw Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 I can concoct a reply using 4-way transfers, but with a known (by North) 34/35 points between you the following is all that is required after South's response 1NT-4♣ (Super Gerber version)4NT (2 Aces & 1 King)-7NT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 Converting our NT system to strong NT. 1N-2♠(weak one minor or GF SI both minors at least 5-4)3♣(4+♦)-3♥(both minors cue agrees ♦)3♠(cue)-4♣(cue)4♦-4♥(aces ?)4♠(0/3)-4N(Q?)5N(yes, no side kings but extras)-6♣(I have one of the K/Q, bid the grand with the other)7♦-7N Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 after a 1n opening 15-17 we are going to be in at least 6n so how do we search for 7? IMHO1n 15-172s Minor Suit Stayman (MSS) (0 to unlimited)3d 4+ diamonds denies 4+ clubs4c RKC for diamonds (you can use CRO here as well)5d 0 or 35h specific king ask (yes even knowing p has no extra kings because it can get us info on club Q yay or nay)5n no kings but a useful Q (clubs Q is useful because of the MSS bid)7n can count 4c 4d 3h 2s as a minimum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBengtsson Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 I bid it easy but will find ♣4-1/5-0 and ♦4-0 in opposite hands :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 I bid it easy but will find ♣4-1/5-0 and ♦4-0 in opposite hands :( Well, if both are guarded by the same hand you can find a simple squeeze by playing off the majors winners first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 Well, if both are guarded by the same hand you can find a simple squeeze by playing off the majors winners first. Actually if E has the 4 diamonds you can pick them up, so it's only an issue if W has 4 diamonds and E 5 clubs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 Actually if E has the 4 diamonds you can pick them up, so it's only an issue if W has 4 diamonds and E 5 clubs. And if such is the case, the bridge god must really hate you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted April 14, 2021 Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 And if such is the case, the bridge god must really hate you. Oh they do, 2 recent examples, we bid a grand that demanded 2 suits only missing the J were Jxxx offside and they were. Also were originally cost a swiss teams event by investigating a slam, signing off in 5 and getting the 5-0 offside break required to beat it. Then when they stuck the results up on the net we found a score entered the wrong way to win by a VP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo1201 Posted April 15, 2021 Report Share Posted April 15, 2021 Oh they do, 2 recent examples, we bid a grand that demanded 2 suits only missing the J were Jxxx offside and they were. Also were originally cost a swiss teams event by investigating a slam, signing off in 5 and getting the 5-0 offside break required to beat it. Then when they stuck the results up on the net we found a score entered the wrong way to win by a VP.I was thinking when you went down in 5, the other table peacefully played in 3 making 10 tricks. Or had left your teammates defend in 4 something for 1 or 2 NV undoubled tricks. Same for the grand, they would be playing 4 making 11 on a sloppy play🤣🤣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts