goffster Posted April 3, 2021 Report Share Posted April 3, 2021 https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10221060887175480&set=gm.10158380813948842&type=3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfi Posted April 3, 2021 Report Share Posted April 3, 2021 I think Mike Passell is on to something with his assessment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted April 3, 2021 Report Share Posted April 3, 2021 Yeah, 4N is pretty awful. 6N isn't a database bid; basic GIB passes it like a shot. Just the usual simulation issues I guess (or maybe GIB is just smarter than us). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted April 3, 2021 Report Share Posted April 3, 2021 Interesting. GIB's definition of 4N is 16-17 HCP, 2-5 ♣, 2-5 ♦, 2-4 ♥, 2-4 ♠. Let's assume it also bids Stayman with a 4 card major (but I'll allow it to have 4333). Quick sim of 500 hands: 13 tricks: 8%12 tricks: 47.2%11 tricks: 36.8%10 tricks: 7.6%9 tricks: 0.4% Perhaps GIB is smarter than us after all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.