Bende Posted February 22, 2021 Report Share Posted February 22, 2021 I am playing a couple of different versions of a 5533 2/1 system. One uses three weak two bids and one uses 2♦ Flannery. I quite like the effects of Flannery on the rest of the system, like 1♥-1♠ showing a five card suit and 1♥-2m; 2♠ showing extras. Now, I am thinking about getting rid of the 18-19 balanced hands somewhere to free up 2NT to show problem hands in sequences like 1♦-1♠; 2NT. One way to do this would be to play 2♦ showing 18-19 balanced. Now, is it completely crazy to lose the possibility to show a weak 2♥ opening by playing 2♦ as 18-19 balanced and 2♥ as Flannery? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spotlight7 Posted February 22, 2021 Report Share Posted February 22, 2021 I am playing a couple of different versions of a 5533 2/1 system. One uses three weak two bids and one uses 2♦ Flannery. I quite like the effects of Flannery on the rest of the system, like 1♥-1♠ showing a five card suit and 1♥-2m; 2♠ showing extras. Now, I am thinking about getting rid of the 18-19 balanced hands somewhere to free up 2NT to show problem hands in sequences like 1♦-1♠; 2NT. One way to do this would be to play 2♦ showing 18-19 balanced. Now, is it completely crazy to lose the possibility to show a weak 2♥ opening by playing 2♦ as 18-19 balanced and 2♥ as Flannery? Are you allowed to use the Kaplan Inversion? Where 1H-1S acts like a forcing 1N and opener rebids 1N with 4S. You still can use 1H-1N* to show 5Ss. That would allow you 2D* as 18-19 and 2H as a weak Two bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted February 22, 2021 Report Share Posted February 22, 2021 I would pay all of my oppoenents to play 2!D=18-19. By all means, starting the bidding above your likely best contact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo1201 Posted February 22, 2021 Report Share Posted February 22, 2021 2H is less preemptive than 2S, as it allows a « cheap » overcall. Therefore, some pairs are ready to lose the bid to show sth else they find more useful, more frequent, or that fits better with the rest of their system, for a best use of this opening. So it is definitely not completely crazy to give it up, to answer OP question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted February 23, 2021 Report Share Posted February 23, 2021 Flannery 2♥ and Mexican 2♦ both make some sense, and I think you can live without the 2♥ opening. When you have a 2♥ opening hand, you have to chose between pass, 1♥ and 3♥. Usually one of the three options is not completely crazy. Make sure you have a consistent style so that partner knows what you are doing and so that you don't have ethical issues with slow 3♥ opening etc. You can also consider something like:1♣=natural OR 18-20 bal 1♦=natural OR 12-14 bal2♦=multi2♥=Flannery 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.