tickerBrkn Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Is there a way to have, for the second 1/2 of a team match, board numbers/dealer/vulnerability continuing from first 1/2.I've loaded boards via .lin where they show as, say, boards 9-16, and the hand editor shows as such, with the correct dealer/vul, but when I use them in a match they show as 1..8 with dealer/vul to match.The cards are as expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evies Dad Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 I think this is a feature of match creation.The boards will have the designated number if you use them at other places in the system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gentgiant Posted January 28, 2021 Report Share Posted January 28, 2021 Is there a way to have, for the second 1/2 of a team match, board numbers/dealer/vulnerability continuing from first 1/2.I've loaded boards via .lin where they show as, say, boards 9-16, and the hand editor shows as such, with the correct dealer/vul, but when I use them in a match they show as 1..8 with dealer/vul to match.The cards are as expected.Use boards numbered 1-8 with sequential vulnerability correct. When the results are compiled using BBOtoXML and merging correctly it will renumber the second half to maintain correct vulnerablity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted January 28, 2021 Report Share Posted January 28, 2021 It's not currently possible to specify the starting board number of a team match, it always starts at 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tickerBrkn Posted February 2, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2021 OK - thanks. That is what I suspected after various trials. It would be handy improvement for a Team Match to use saved boards as numbered/specified dealer and vulnerability.Having to generate multiple sets starting from 1 takes a lot longer than generating 1 set and splitting the file.Referring to the boards later is a lot nicer if you can say Board 14 rather than "Board 2 in Round 3".If merging all the results into some other system that changing the board numbers in subsequent rounds, some software fusses when the dealer and vulnerability don't match BoardNumber Standards; the alternative is to start each set as multiple of 16, leaving gaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.