goffster Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 Perhaps utterly deranged.Bbo forums robot tourney.https://tinyurl.com/y9eqd8b7 2s!? Lack of double of 1n!? 2s even more incomprehensible since I am known to not even hold 3sWhat is the matter with 3D if it feels it simply has to bid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 ♠J854 is an excellent suit. Not quite good enough to jump rebid 3♠ so that's why 2♠ was chosen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 [hv=lin=st||pn|~~v3fakebot,~~v3fakebot,goffster,~~v3fakebot|md|4SA9HAKT4DT8632C74,SQ62HQ3DA974C6532,SJ854H862DKQJCKT9,SKT73HJ975D5CAQJ8|sv|n|rh||ah|Board%202|mb|P|mb|1D|an|Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20!D;%2011-21%20HCP;%2012-22%20total%20points|mb|P|mb|1S|an|One%20over%20one%20--%204+%20!S;%206+%20total%20points|mb|D|an|Two%20suit%20takeout%20--%204+%20!C;%205-%20!D;%204+%20!H;%205-%20!S;%2011-%20HCP;%2012%20total%20points|mb|P|mb|1N|an|One%20NT%20to%20double%20--%202-5%20!C;%202-5%20!D;%202-4%20!H;%202-4%20!S;%208-11%20HCP|mb|P|mb|P|mb|2D|an|3-%20!S;%2021-%20HCP;%20biddable%20!D;%2014-22%20total%20points|mb|P|mb|2S|an|4-%20!D;%206+%20!S;%206-8%20total%20points|mb|P|mb|P|mb|P|pc|D5|pc|D2|pc|DA|pc|DJ|pc|C6|pc|C9|pc|CJ|pc|C4|pc|CA|pc|C7|pc|C2|pc|CT|pc|CQ|pc|H4|pc|C5|pc|CK|pc|S4|pc|S7|pc|S9|pc|SQ|pc|H3|pc|H2|pc|HJ|pc|HK|pc|SA|pc|S2|pc|S5|pc|S3|pc|D3|pc|D4|pc|DK|pc|ST|pc|H9|pc|HA|pc|HQ|pc|H6|pc|D6|pc|D9|pc|DQ|pc|SK|pc|C8|pc|D8|pc|C3|pc|S8|pc|SJ|pc|H7|pc|DT|pc|S6|pc|H8|pc|H5|pc|HT|pc|D7|]300|300|goffster 'Perhaps utterly deranged.Bbo forums robot tourney. 2s!? Lack of double of 1n!? 2s even more incomprehensible since I am known to not even hold 3s. What is the matter with 3D if it feels it simply has to bid?'++++++++++++++++++++++IMO - GIB used to bid better but recent ad hoc tinkering (to address specific issues) has introduced more bugs than it fixed.- What GIB needs is a new bidding program, specifying bids in open-source readable tables (e.g. FD or Kungsgeten's mark-up). This would help to increase coverage and to avoid stupid mistakes. It would also allow GIB to understand opponents' bidding (when presented in that new format); and to play its partner's preferred system.- GIB would be much better if it underwent rigorous regression-testing after each fix -- to mitigate the introduction of new bugs,[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 a simple regression-check would be pysch-detection: high-light cases where the systemic description of a call differs widely from the actual hand (as in Goffster's example). Sometimes there is a tactical argument for a psych; but rarely in uncontested constructive auctions; and GIB should be especially careful to avoid CPUs :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goffster Posted December 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2020 I would like to add, it was robot that bid 2s, not me. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.