lukasz Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 1) There is a very small font2) Pairs >11 don't know, what overall place they have3) On the first page there is no score... Is it only my (and my friends) opinion, or your too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rain Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 Same opinion here lukasz. I think this new format is not easily readable for those with less than perfect eyesight, and the ranking...hard to know the rank... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickyB Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 I thought the new layout was a great improvement! Though of course if others have problems reading it that should take priority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendare Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 :D It is a pain in the neck less about three feet----maybe two feet for the short folks. The old format was far more readable and understandable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwingo Posted June 8, 2005 Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Prefer the previous font and font size. Prefer the current format. Godwin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aisha759 Posted June 8, 2005 Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 I prefer the previous... if sound was put for the seing impared, they will have trouble reading scores, unless there is an option in "voice" that reads out scores and rankings :lol: Aisha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extrasolid Posted June 8, 2005 Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 :) I agree; i like the old format much more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigpenz Posted June 8, 2005 Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 I like the old format better, but I am sure we must be able to change the fonts and size in configuration Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzo75 Posted June 9, 2005 Report Share Posted June 9, 2005 I also find the new scoring a little bit confusing. I would suggest a "compilation" between the old and new formats: First Overall standing down to the last pair with score and then NS/EW scoring for statistics' maniacs :P Of course with readable fonts :) itzo75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted June 11, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 11, 2005 Hm... In the ACBL-scores there is rank A,B,C... What is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mink Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 I like the old font more than the new one. About the format, I dislike that there is a different leaderboard for each section. This would only be justified if the overall strength of the sections differs significantly, but as the players cannot control in which section they play, all sections should probably have the same strength. The only valid reason for differen leaderboards are tourneys where half the plairs only play North/South and the other half only play East/West. There, we should see a North/South leaderboard and a East/West leaderboard, and there should be no overall leaderboard at all. Karl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwingo Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 The tournament results page has been tweakened and now the format and font / font size is OK & neat. Great job. However the Results for Team Match can be improved slightly. The font and font size is readable and good, only the layout may need a small change. As of now, the layout is Team1: player1+player2 Player3+Player4 Team2: Player5+Player6 Player7+Player8 If there is some more spacing between the Player names and between the Pair names ( or Pair names on another line) it will be easier on the eyes like in Team1: Player1 + Player2 some more space Player3 + Player4 Team2: Player5 + Player6 some more space Player7 + Player8 or Team1: Player1 + Player2 Player3 + Player4 Team2: Player5 + Player6 Player7 + Player8 Godwin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwingo Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 I don't know if this is a bug, or if it is the way that it was intended. Anyway, if a Team Match ends in a tie ( It happened to me yesterday) , Team 1 is declared the winner. In yesterdays's Fido vs Dido match, both were tied at 38 IMP's each. The results screen however had this information. Rank Team Score1 Fido 0.01 Fido 0.0 Team1: Fido: Players names for Fido Team2: Dido: Players names for Dido Though it ranked both the Teams as Rank 1, it did not pick up the 2nd Team Name. This can be checked in the Recent tourneys website under this listing:Fri Jul 01 11:40 am CDT Dwingo Teams IMP Show boards #621 Teams Garden City - Preset deals Godwin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.