luckyloser Posted September 1, 2020 Report Share Posted September 1, 2020 ♠AQJx♥♦Kxxx♣KQxxx ♠xxxx♥KQxxx♦xxx♣x NS play better minor.N declarer, not vuln.N opens 1♣, S responds 1♥, N bids 1♠ how should the bidding continue? should S bid 2♠? he is minimum but has a ruffing value and a good sidesuit which p knows and thus can judge easily? if S raises, should N bid 4♠, try with a minor or 3♠ or pass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted September 1, 2020 Report Share Posted September 1, 2020 Your poll is missing 2♠, 4♣ and other :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcphee Posted September 1, 2020 Report Share Posted September 1, 2020 S should raise to 2!S. N next step depends on form of scoring. I would pass if match points, make a game try of 3!D at imps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyloser Posted September 1, 2020 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2020 Your poll is missing 2♠, 4♣ and other :) we assums the bidding goes:1♣ 1♥1♠2♠ what now?should opnere try for game, or bid it or pass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfi Posted September 5, 2020 Report Share Posted September 5, 2020 I don't think you can not try for game. DQ and CJ go a long way to making it playable. So I describe my hand with 3D and let partner make the decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullve Posted September 5, 2020 Report Share Posted September 5, 2020 1♣-1♥1♠-2♠3♠*-P * leaks less than 3♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted September 5, 2020 Report Share Posted September 5, 2020 ♠AQJx♥♦Kxxx♣KQxxx ♠xxxx♥KQxxx♦xxx♣x NS play better minor.N declarer, not vuln.N opens 1♣, S responds 1♥, N bids 1♠ how should the bidding continue? should S bid 2♠? he is minimum but has a ruffing value and a good sidesuit which p knows and thus can judge easily? if S raises, should N bid 4♠, try with a minor or 3♠ or pass? Hi, the shortage is in partners long suit, i.e. it is not a big asset.The heart suit hits partners shortage, who will quite often have only 2 / sometimes a single, if he has the Ace the suit is brilliant, otherwise also not a big asset.You only have a 44 fit, weak trumps, if partner cant move over a single raise, you will be happy playing 2S. Over a 2S raise North should invite, if possible showing concentrated club values, again the shortage in partnerssuit is not an asset, the void is even worse than the single.Responder should decline the invite, at most he can make a counter invite. Opener will accept the counter invite. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted September 5, 2020 Report Share Posted September 5, 2020 [hv=pc=n&w=saqj6hdk864ckq864&e=s9753hkq753d753c7&d=w&v=0&a=1cp1hp1sp2sp?]266|200|LuckyLoser "LA. better minor.++++++++++++++++++++Deal rotated to make West dealer. I rank ...1. 3♠ = INV Minimises leakage, as as Nullve points out. 2. 3♣ = G/T ♣ values, as Marlowe suggests.3. 3♦ = G/T Pattern out like SFI.4. Pass = S/O Timid but likely to work well on this misfit.5. 4♠ = NAT Brave.[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted September 9, 2020 Report Share Posted September 9, 2020 3♦ here acts somewhat like a bluhmer telling partner to downgrade heart values but to treat a hand like ♠xxxx ♥xxxx ♦Qx ♣Axx as gold. If you do not bid it with this hand, you might as well attach a different meaning to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.