helene_t Posted August 3, 2020 Report Share Posted August 3, 2020 Playing solitaire: (1♣)-1NT-(p)-2♣(p)-2♦ The 2♦ bid is explained as "aggressive weak jump overcall, 6+ diamonds, 4-9 points" or something like that. The (robot) partner's subsequent 3NT suggests that it was interpreted correctly, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted August 3, 2020 Report Share Posted August 3, 2020 I think Solitaire is a bit broken at the moment. There have been a few other threads where GIB's description was as if it had forgotten several bids earlier in the auction - eg this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted August 3, 2020 Report Share Posted August 3, 2020 [hv=d=w&v=0&b=8&a=1c1np2Cp2D(Agressive WJO 6-9 HCP)P3NPPP]133|100|Helene_T "Playing solitaire:" +++++++++++++++++++++IMO, Recent changes to GIB haven't improved it :( [/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullve Posted August 3, 2020 Report Share Posted August 3, 2020 So 1N was Comic/Gardener? :) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted August 3, 2020 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2020 I think Solitaire is a bit broken at the moment. There have been a few other threads where GIB's description was as if it had forgotten several bids earlier in the auction - eg this one.Yes there are many examples of this, it seems that in general only the last round of bidding is used for explaining bids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted August 6, 2020 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2020 It's more complex than I thought. Uncontested 1m-1M2nis apparently "unusual". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.