pilowsky Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 Also the Forum challenge is on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 I agree there are more than 288 Prime members. Vampyr said there were more than 19 Prime members. This is what "at least 20" means. You said Vampyr was wrong. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullve Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 I agree there are more than 288 Prime members. Vampyr said there were strictly more than 19 Prime members. This is what "at least 20" means. You said Vampyr was wrong.FYP :) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilowsky Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 To be fair, four people voted and two others offered suggestions. How many people are on Prime (paying members). I am guessing at least 20, so the sample size seems small. Says vampyr What does she mean? Does she mean that there are ? Or does she mean something else? Perhaps she means - wait for it.... YES... around about 20. Who says at least 20 if they are thinking of a number that is around 200? BUT. the evidence is there are quite a lot more than 20, in fact, actual data suggests more than 288. Using inductive reasoning oh forget it.... Is that how you quote for a job? Do you say I'm going to charge at least $20 for the whole job and then present a bill for $3,000,000,000. What madness is this Släng dig i väggen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbb483 Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 Useful thread this - it has just encouraged me to learn how to ignore a poster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shyams Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 Hahaha, this is becoming puerile asinine. smerriman, I hope you agree with me that continuing this is a waste of your patience + energy. I hope you can be sure that at least 1 person (which means "zero or one people" :)) is 100% in agreement with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilowsky Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 And just to show how useful the prime area is - for me anyway - I made a whole bunch of hands with the playbridge generator so that I could practice defence. This one just came up: My North robot went down 1 vulnerable in 4H. I was a bit taken aback until I saw the whole hand. What a great partner![hv=pc=n&s=skj532ht9654dt8cj&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=p1d2dp4hppdppp]133|200[/hv] Here's the LIN file, Here's the PBN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilowsky Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 Hahaha, this is becoming puerile asinine. smerriman, I hope you agree with me that continuing this is a waste of your patience + energy. I hope you can be sure that at least 1 person (which means "zero or one people" :)) is 100% in agreement with you. Does that mean that perhaps nobody agrees with smerriman? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbb483 Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 And just to show how useful the prime area is - for me anyway - I made a whole bunch of hands with the playbridge generator so that I could practice defence. This one just came up: My North robot went down 1 vulnerable in 4H. I was a bit taken aback until I saw the whole hand. What a great partner![hv=pc=n&s=skj532ht9654dt8cj&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=p1d2dp4hppdppp]133|200[/hv] Here's the LIN file, Here's the PBN Except the West robot should've doubled the 2D, then the East robot has no problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilowsky Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 You're right! Boy, there's going to be trouble when East gets West home tonight.There'll be a cold wind blowing for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted July 26, 2020 Report Share Posted July 26, 2020 Says vampyr What does she mean? Does she mean that there are ? Or does she mean something else? Perhaps she means - wait for it.... YES... around about 20. Who says at least 20 if they are thinking of a number that is around 200? BUT. the evidence is there are quite a lot more than 20, in fact, actual data suggests more than 288. Using inductive reasoning oh forget it.... Is that how you quote for a job? Do you say I'm going to charge at least $20 for the whole job and then present a bill for $3,000,000,000. What madness is this Släng dig i väggenI think she just picked a number that was significantly more than the 4 people who voted and/or suggested. If the number is actually many times larger, it just reinforces her point: the people posting here might not be representative of the Prime community. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.