Jump to content

To bid or not to bid part 2


  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your bid

    • Pass
      12
    • Double
      3
    • 2H
      31
    • 2S
      0
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&w=sk8hakt86d62cq763&d=e&v=e&b=6&a=p1s?]133|200|

Nethken "North South play 4 card majors. Teams if it matters to you"

++++++++++++++

I rank

1. 2 = NAT Dangerous but "it's a bidder's game".

2. Pass = NAT "Discretion is the better part of valour".

3. Double = T/O "Once more unto the breach dear friends."

4. 2 = CUE "Michaels? The lunatics have taken over the asylum".[/hv]

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this actually the west hand ? or did west pass and N bid 1 ?

 

Assuming one of those, I'm happy with 2 and pass, and wouldn't criticise partner for either, with a nice heart suit I might bid but opps will probably play spades so I don't need to tell myself to lead one. Vulnerability just leans me towards pass, just possible this will end the auction for -200/500 with nothing on for the opps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Style counts. In my current partnerships, we open all balanced 11 counts, we we have slightly different inference as to partner’s hand than do most. Game is very unlikely opposite a passed hand. We have a minimum in hcp,for a red v white overcall, and short hearts. Make one of my minor spots a heart, and 2H would be clear, and probably unanimous. OTOH, we have the 108 in hearts, and we are very likely to get a spade lead. Plus, if LHO is going to be declaring,we’d like a heart lead, and we’re 2=5=2=4 not 2=5=3=3

 

This is borderline but I think bidding is ‘normal’. If playing a weak team, I pass since I don’t expect to lose a game swing often, and going 800 or 1100 into their game is too much to risk. Under all other conditions, I bid 2H.....but I’d be very afraid Opposite my partners, I’d pass, nervously.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to follow mikeh, but South's spade king is in the right position and he has just enough for 2H.

Yeah, poorly written. But I’d pass in my partnerships due to our opening almost all 11 counts, thus partners pass means we are very unlikely to have game, and the hand is too dangerous to want to fight for a partial. Passing might lose 5-6 imps but it won’t lose 12. Plus, sometimes passing with values leads the opps astray. Very close decision and in a 15-17 1N style, thus partner passes balanced 11 counts, I’d be (nervously) overcalling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pass. The suit quality is not quite good enough for a red vs white overcall (I'd like a sixth heart), and with my luck at the bridge table I am not pushing it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&w=sk8hakt86d62cq763&d=e&v=e&b=6&a=p1s]133|200[/hv]

 

North South play 4 card majors

 

Teams if it matters to you

 

EDIT Of course this is west hand

 

I pass without a second thought. There is no sensible action with this hand..and the vulnerability is against you.

Best to pass and await developments. Bidding 2 with that suit is just tempting Fate.. North hasn't yet bid and could be sitting

with the balance of the heart suit over you ready tp pounce..Play safe and pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sir,

very recently I held QJ54KQJ83VOIDAJ86. Partner passed RHO opened 1--Do you bid or pass?

I passed and the bidding went 1Pass-3PASS4 Now what Pass or anything else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike H and I pretty much know there is no 4 game on due to what we open on in first seat. I absolutely agree with his assessment.

 

In order to almost be certain it is not reasonable 4 vulnerable, you need an opening bid for west on a hand like this;

 

7 5 3, Q J 7 5, A 9 7 5 3, 8

 

Do you? That would be pretty effective here indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to almost be certain it is not reasonable 4 vulnerable, you need an opening bid for west on a hand like this;

 

7 5 3, Q J 7 5, A 9 7 5 3, 8

 

Do you? That would be pretty effective here indeed.

 

We opened that 2 although Mike H didn't (don't ask). You also probably aren't oubidding or beating 4 if they're 3-1 or making 4 on a trump lead unless diamonds are 3-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think partner should stick his neck out with an SOS xx?

I would have overcalled 2H. I would redouble for sos now. I would not be confident about either action, but experience suggests when they pass this double, with a game bonus on the line, they are usually right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=lin=st||pn|South,nekthen,North,partner|md|4SQT953H9DAKQ4CK92,SK8HAKT86D62CQ763,SA2HQJ5432DJ83C85,SJ764H7DT975CAJT4|sv|e|rh||ah|Board%206|mb|P|mb|1S|mb|2H|mb|P|mb|P|mb|D|mb|P|mb|P|mb|P|pc|SA|pc|S4|pc|ST|pc|S8|pc|D3|pc|D5|pc|DQ|pc|D2|pc|DK|pc|D6|pc|D8|pc|D7|pc|D4|pc|H6|pc|DJ|pc|D9|pc|CQ|pc|C5|pc|C4|pc|CK|pc|DA|pc|H8|pc|HJ|pc|DT|pc|C8|pc|CT|pc|C9|pc|C3|pc|H7|pc|H9|pc|HK|pc|H2|pc|HA|pc|H3|pc|S6|pc|S3|pc|SK|pc|S2|pc|S7|pc|S5|pc|C6|pc|H4|pc|CJ|pc|C2|pc|HQ|pc|SJ|pc|S9|pc|HT|pc|H5|pc|CA|pc|SQ|pc|C7|]300|300|

Nethken "This went for 800.

Do you think partner should stick his neck out with an SOS xx?"

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bidding problem reposted to BridgeWinners

https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-a5xvjhlai6/

 

MikeH and CyberYeti sussed it out :) Hard luck Nethken :( With different views declarer might escape for -500. But that wouldn't be much consolation :(

 

IMO East shouldn't SOS-redouble with his actual hand. With a void, he might consider it, especially at pairs. [/hv]

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to almost be certain it is not reasonable 4 vulnerable, you need an opening bid for west on a hand like this;

 

7 5 3, Q J 7 5, A 9 7 5 3, 8

 

Do you? That would be pretty effective here indeed.

Anyone can make up hands to fit what they want to do. Bridge is a game of probabilities, and the odds are that partner does NOT have a magic layout.

 

I am not a fan of double dummy simulations in most situations. We don’t (at least I don’t) play double dummy but even more importantly such simulations are heavily dependent upon the constraints. However, this sort of situation likely does lend itself to a simulation.

 

You’d have to design the constraints to exclude hands where partner would have bid, and for what rho considers a 1S opening.

 

You’d also need to look at each hand and decide how the auction would go were you to overcall, and that’s very difficult to do once one knows the cards: there is a tendency to let one’s prior beliefs influence one’s views.

 

However, such an approach is infinitely better than sitting down and coming up wupith hands that make one’s preferred bidding work well,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...