Jump to content

Why?


2200

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=sj763ha3djt85ck76&w=saqt85hkqtd9ca842&n=s2h962d763cqjt953&e=sk94hj8754dakq42c]399|300[/hv]

After W opened 1S, N led Q against 6S, at both table.

At my table, ruffed at trick 1, declarer played K and Ace, finding trumps 4-1, down 1.

At GIB's table, ruffed at trick 1, K,9,covered by S!!!

17 imp swing.

I still don't understand, what makes bot cover?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what was the auction?

if north bid 3 there would be all the reason in the world to play it this way.

the normal C for opps would be 5579, so if north bids 3 it makes it more likely that

south would have 4 spades....look at Mckinnons book on bridge probablities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if north bid 3 there would be all the reason in the world to play it this way.

You're missing the point - it's South's play that is a terrible play that no human would do, but standard for GIB; covering the 9 with the J guarantees declarer takes all the trumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're missing the point - it's South's play that is a terrible play that no human would do, but standard for GIB; covering the 9 with the J guarantees declarer takes all the trumps.

yes I understand that but still would like to know if there had been any bidding???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes I understand that but still would like to know if there had been any bidding???

If there was no bidding, there wouldn't be a contract to play :lol:

 

In the actual case, West has opened the bidding 1 which promises 5 spades. From GIB's perspective as South, partner must have a singleton spade so there is no possible spade trick because declarer will finesse (double dummy play) the jack. Therefore South mistakenly thinks it doesn't make any difference whether South covers the spade or not.

 

This is one of the huge weaknesses of GIB because declarer would normally play for a 3-2 spade break and end up losing a trick to the jack, but South has randomly thrown away a trick by a useless and hopeless cover on the second spade trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...